Skip to content
Advertisement

U.S. Supreme Court

Latest Stories

MARRIAGE_20140619_005.JPG

MARRIAGE_20140619_005.JPG

Manuel Portillo of Elizabeth, N.J. holds pro marriage flags during a rally on the West Lawn of the U.S. Capitol Building before marching to the U.S. Supreme Court for the second annual March for Marriage, Washington, D.C., Thursday, June 19, 2014. The group is returning to the supreme court for a second year in a row after their first march last year on the day the Court heard oral arguments in the case Hollingsorth v. Perry that argued the legality of California's Proposition 8. (Andrew Harnik/The Washington Times)

MARRIAGE_20140619_003.JPG

MARRIAGE_20140619_003.JPG

A woman dressed as President Barack Obama who calls herself Catholic Carol, left, who is against gay marriage, debates with Niqk White [cq] of Richmond, Va., who joins others in a counter protest near a rally on the West Lawn of the U.S. Capitol Building a march to the U.S. Supreme Court for the second annual March for Marriage, Washington, D.C., Thursday, June 19, 2014. The group is returning to the supreme court for a second year in a row after their first march last year on the day the Court heard oral arguments in the case Hollingsorth v. Perry that argued the legality of California's Proposition 8. (Andrew Harnik/The Washington Times)

MARRIAGE_20140619_004.JPG

MARRIAGE_20140619_004.JPG

Left to right: Leo Martin of Front Royal, Va., against gay marriage debates with Mandy Roach and Chelsea Fredrikson both of Providence, R.I., and Amy Joslin of New Bedford, Mass. who hold a counter protest near a rally on the West Lawn of the U.S. Capitol Building before they march to the U.S. Supreme Court for the second annual March for Marriage, Washington, D.C., Thursday, June 19, 2014. The group is returning to the supreme court for a second year in a row after their first march last year on the day the Court heard oral arguments in the case Hollingsorth v. Perry that argued the legality of California's Proposition 8. (Andrew Harnik/The Washington Times)

MARRIAGE_20140619_002.JPG

MARRIAGE_20140619_002.JPG

Cesar Chach of Plainsville, N.J., center, cheers during a rally on the West Lawn of the U.S. Capitol Building before marching to the U.S. Supreme Court for the second annual March for Marriage, Washington, D.C., Thursday, June 19, 2014. The group is returning to the supreme court for a second year in a row after their first march last year on the day the Court heard oral arguments in the case Hollingsorth v. Perry that argued the legality of California's Proposition 8. (Andrew Harnik/The Washington Times)

MARRIAGE_20140619_001.JPG

MARRIAGE_20140619_001.JPG

Latino Partnership for Conservative Principles Executive Director Alfonso Aguilar speaks at a rally on the West Lawn of the U.S. Capitol Building before marching to the U.S. Supreme Court for the second annual March for Marriage, Washington, D.C., Thursday, June 19, 2014. The group is returning to the supreme court for a second year in a row after their first march last year on the day the Court heard oral arguments in the case Hollingsorth v. Perry that argued the legality of California's Proposition 8. (Andrew Harnik/The Washington Times)

e70add0b84e73317570f6a7067006d92.jpg

e70add0b84e73317570f6a7067006d92.jpg

This Feb. 3, 2014, file photo shows U.S. Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito holding up a figurine of himself that someone gave him, as he speaks at the Palm Beach County Convention Center in West Palm Beach, Fla. (AP Photo/Wilfredo Lee,File)

3c38b431b70e6214550f6a7067000a54.jpg

3c38b431b70e6214550f6a7067000a54.jpg

FILE- In this April 10, 2013 file photo, Fox television reporter Jana Winter, right, and her attorneys arrive at district court for a hearing for Aurora theater shooting suspect James Holmes in Centennial, Colo. The U.S. Supreme Court said Tuesday, May 27, 2014 that Winter does not have to reveal her confidential sources for a story about Holmes. (AP Photo/Ed Andrieski, File)

SUPREME_20140505_010.JPG

SUPREME_20140505_010.JPG

Faith and Action President Rob Schenck holds a press conference with Raymond Moore and Patty Bills in front of the U.S. Supreme Court building following their ruling on Monday that prayers that open town council meetings do not violate the Constitution even if they routinely stress Christianity, Washington, D.C., Monday, May 5, 2014. (Andrew Harnik/The Washington Times)

SUPREME_20140505_003.JPG

SUPREME_20140505_003.JPG

Faith and Action President Rob Schenck, left, holds a press conference with Patty Bills, right, in front of the U.S. Supreme Court building following their ruling on Monday that prayers that open town council meetings do not violate the Constitution even if they routinely stress Christianity, Washington, D.C., Monday, May 5, 2014. (Andrew Harnik/The Washington Times)

SUPREME_20140505_001.JPG

SUPREME_20140505_001.JPG

Faith and Action President Rob Schenck, center, holds a press conference with Raymond Moore, left, and Patty Bills, right, in front of the U.S. Supreme Court building following their ruling on Monday that prayers that open town council meetings do not violate the Constitution even if they routinely stress Christianity, Washington, D.C., Monday, May 5, 2014. (Andrew Harnik/The Washington Times)

SUPREME_20140505_009.JPG

SUPREME_20140505_009.JPG

Faith and Action President Rob Schenck, right, holds a press conference with Raymond Moore, second from left, and Patty Bills, left, in front of the U.S. Supreme Court building following their ruling on Monday that prayers that open town council meetings do not violate the Constitution even if they routinely stress Christianity, Washington, D.C., Monday, May 5, 2014. (Andrew Harnik/The Washington Times)

43fdf3c49d554f11530f6a706700e4d6.jpg

43fdf3c49d554f11530f6a706700e4d6.jpg

FILE - In this April 26, 2014 file photo, people walk on the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington. The Supreme Court said Monday that prayers that open town council meetings do not violate the Constitution even if they routinely stress Christianity. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)

e40f9f4fc1f1b010520f6a7067006553.jpg

e40f9f4fc1f1b010520f6a7067006553.jpg

People walk on the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington on Saturday April 26, 2014. The Supreme Court is considering whether police may search cellphones found on people they arrest without first getting a warrant. The court’s latest foray into the issue of privacy in the digital age involves two cases being argued Tuesday that arose from searches of phones carried by a gang member and a drug dealer. Police looked through their cellphones after taking the suspects into custody and found evidence that led to their convictions and lengthy prison terms. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)