Skip to content
Advertisement

FILE - In this April 18, 2005 file photo, Ali Al-Tamimi, center, walks with two unidentified men, as he leaves the Albert V. Bryan Courthouse, in Alexandria, Va. A federal judge may toss out parts of a 10-count conviction against the Islamic scholar serving life in prison for persuading some followers to try to join the Taliban after the Sept. 11 attacks. The review in the case of Al-Timimi, of Virginia, comes after a Monday, June 24, 2019 ruling by the Supreme Court striking down part of a federal law regulating crimes of violence as unconstitutionally vague. Judge Leonie Brinkema on Tuesday, June 25 asked prosecutors to explain why she shouldn’t overturn three of the counts. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta, File)

FILE - In this April 18, 2005 file photo, Ali Al-Tamimi, center, walks with two unidentified men, as he leaves the Albert V. Bryan Courthouse, in Alexandria, Va. A federal judge may toss out parts of a 10-count conviction against the Islamic scholar serving life in prison for persuading some followers to try to join the Taliban after the Sept. 11 attacks. The review in the case of Al-Timimi, of Virginia, comes after a Monday, June 24, 2019 ruling by the Supreme Court striking down part of a federal law regulating crimes of violence as unconstitutionally vague. Judge Leonie Brinkema on Tuesday, June 25 asked prosecutors to explain why she shouldn’t overturn three of the counts. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta, File)

Featured Photo Galleries