Skip to content

Read More

The art of the possible: Charlie Hurt on the Trump-Musk cosmic bromance

Advertisement

Supreme Court Justice Clarence argued last week in his opinion in Gamble v. United States that a judge's duty to interpret the Constitution trumps stare decisis, and if the courts got it wrong in the past, then they need to fix it rather than stick with incorrect precedent. (Associated Press/File)

Supreme Court Justice Clarence argued last week in his opinion in Gamble v. United States that a judge's duty to interpret the Constitution trumps stare decisis, and if the courts got it wrong in the past, then they need to fix it rather than stick with incorrect precedent. (Associated Press/File)

Featured Photo Galleries