A version of this story appeared in the On Background newsletter from The Washington Times. Click here to receive On Background delivered directly to your inbox each Friday.
It was bawdy. It was sordid. But will it matter by November?
Adult film actress Stormy Daniels’ testimony about an extramarital sexual encounter with former President Donald Trump is the kind of thing that would sink a normal politician. But there was no indication Wednesday that his Rolodex of congressional supporters or evangelical base was ready to ditch him over Ms. Daniels’ X-rated narrative.
“After everything the public has ingested about Donald Trump over the past nine years, is this latest testimony the breath mint that will cause it all to explode? I really doubt it,” said Patrick Murray, director of the Monmouth University Polling Institute in New Jersey. “Nothing has moved the basic polling numbers in the past.”
Still, in an election where the smallest margins matter, Ms. Daniels’ salacious tale could sway undecided independents and suburban women whom both parties are courting.
Ms. Daniels, in testimony Tuesday, said she didn’t expect to have sex after a dinner in Lake Tahoe at a golf tournament. She said Mr. Trump was “bigger and blocking the way, but I was not threatened either verbally or physically.”
SEE ALSO: Perjury questions dog Michael Cohen ahead of Trump trial testimony
Lori Goldman, the founder of Fems for Dems in Michigan, said a percentage of voters will be disgusted by Ms. Daniels’ testimony and compare it to situations in which they faced a power imbalance and wish they had handled it differently.
“I think this taps into experiences most women over 40 have experienced in their lives — or even men who might have had experiences like this,” she said.
Whether that share is enough to decide a national election is a thornier question.
“I’m not counting on it being a lot. I’m really not,” said Ms. Goldman, whose organization promotes liberal candidates.
Mr. Trump is the first former president to face a criminal trial. He is also the presumptive Republican nominee in this year’s race against President Biden, so it was a remarkable scene as Ms. Daniels detailed a sexual encounter with so much detail that it made the judge uneasy.
Mr. Trump denies the sexual encounter happened.
Ms. Daniels’ claims and the related criminal charges against Mr. Trump, based on alleged efforts to conceal a hush money payment, are several years old and were publicly debated before the 2020 election that Mr. Trump lost to Mr. Biden.
“It’s old news in a new wrapping,” said Ross Baker, a politics professor at Rutgers University in New Jersey.
Mr. Trump, he said, “rode out Access Hollywood and Charlottesville. In the eyes of his many supporters, he is a knight in shining armor.”
There are also signs that many voters aren’t putting much stock in the trial despite the media circus in lower Manhattan.
A recent Suffolk University poll found that 44% of voters don’t believe the trial has been fair, while 39% believe Mr. Trump is getting a fair shake and 16% are undecided.
A Suffolk poll from March, before the trial started, found a third of voters (32%) were not tracking the case at all and 22% were following it “not too closely.” Only 15% were following the case “very closely,” and 29% were tracking it somewhat closely, pollsters found.
The trial is now in its third week, and Ms. Goldman said folks in her swing state are rapt.
“Haven’t you seen the sales of popcorn going up?” she said. “You hear it on the radio, you see it on the front page. The local cashiers are making jokes about it.”
They will have more to talk about Thursday when Ms. Daniels resumes her testimony.
She is facing a withering cross-examination by Mr. Trump’s attorneys, who argue that Ms. Daniels shifted her story over time and effectively extorted Mr. Trump on the cusp of the 2016 election.
Things got so heated Tuesday that state Supreme Court Judge Juan Merchan told Mr. Trump’s attorneys to rein in their client.
“I understand that your client is upset at this point, but he is cursing audibly, and he is shaking his head visually and that’s contemptuous,” Judge Merchan told attorney Todd Blanche during a sidebar conversation, according to transcripts. “It has the potential to intimidate the witness, and the jury can see that.”
Prosecutors say they have less than two weeks of testimony before the defense mounts its case.
Michael Cohen, who facilitated nondisclosure payments as Mr. Trump’s attorney in 2016 and sought reimbursements at the heart of the charges, will be the prosecution’s major witness when Ms. Daniels has finished testifying.
Defense attorneys are expected to rough up Cohen over his criminal record and whether he is a credible witness.
Congressional Republicans on Wednesday prodded the Justice Department to investigate Cohen over allegations he lied to Congress in several pieces of testimony.
Reps. Jim Jordan, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, and James Comer, chairman of the House Oversight and Accountability Committee, suggested that it should give pause to Alvin Bragg, the Manhattan district attorney who brought the case years after the payments were made.
“In short, to prosecute President Trump, Bragg has revived this ‘zombie’ case relying on a known — and convicted — liar and his testimony at a congressional hearing in which he lied at least six times,” the lawmakers said in a letter to U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland.
Pollsters say a subset of key voters will decide the race based on issues such as the economy and immigration and not what happens in the Manhattan courtroom.
“Nothing in this trial is new news to voters, or at best, they’re confused and chalk it up to just an attempt to take Trump off the campaign trail,” said Brent Buchanan, president of the Cygnal polling and analytics firm in Washington. “Feelings about Trump are already cemented and the deciding votes — less than 50,000 voters across five states — to swing the election won’t be because of trials, [but] rather the issues.”
• Stephen Dinan contributed to this report.
• Tom Howell Jr. can be reached at thowell@washingtontimes.com.
Please read our comment policy before commenting.