A version of this story appeared in the On Background newsletter from The Washington Times. Click here to receive On Background delivered directly to your inbox each Friday.
President Biden is moving full steam ahead to construct a temporary pier on the Gaza Strip shore, but at least one member of Congress wants to ensure he complies with the same stringent environmental checks required of domestic projects.
Rep. Thomas Tiffany, Wisconsin Republican, urged the House Appropriations Committee to ensure that the pier passes muster with the National Environmental Policy Act, the Endangered Species Act, conservation provisions in 2024 spending bills and a potential foreign aid supplemental bill.
The proposed pier and two-lane causeway that Mr. Biden unveiled last week in his State of the Union address will make an environmental impact, require as many as 1,000 U.S. troops and span “more than a quarter mile to accommodate truck traffic and freight operations,” he said.
“As you know, NEPA has long required the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement [EIS] for any action that has a substantial impact on the natural environment,” Mr. Tiffany said Monday in his letter, a copy of which was obtained by The Washington Times. “If media reports about the scope of this project are accurate, it certainly suggests that such an assessment would be justified.”
The administration “should also consider potentially negative effects that the project may have on threatened or endangered species, habitat and ecosystem preservation, and the loss or destruction of any cultural and historical antiquities that might be present within the project’s planned footprint.”
DOCUMENT: Rep. Tom Tiffany's letter
Mr. Tiffany’s request could be interpreted as a jab at the White House and federal environmental regulations, which Republicans have long criticized for delaying and running up costs on U.S. infrastructure, energy and wildfire mitigation projects.
Mr. Biden is trying to increase humanitarian aid to Gaza as he walks a political tightrope between his support for Israel, a staunch U.S. ally, and pressure from his party’s left wing to force a cease-fire before his November election rematch with former President Donald Trump.
The Army sent a vessel over the weekend with equipment to build the temporary pier, designed to provide a sea route for humanitarian aid. Gaza has been cut off from supplies during the Israel-Hamas war spurred by the Oct. 7 Hamas massacre of Israeli civilians and foreign nationals.
Whether the overseas pier must comply with federal environmental regulations is another question, but Congress could mandate such requirements.
In 1979, President Carter signed an executive order requiring federal agencies to take environmental factors into account “when making decisions on major Federal Actions which could have environmental impacts anywhere beyond the borders of the U.S., including Antarctica.”
The Washington Times has reached out to the White House for comment.
Mr. Tiffany said the pier, which is expected to take 60 days to build, would be a boon to Hamas, the U.S.-designated foreign terrorist organization that has ruled the Gaza Strip since taking over in 2007.
“It goes without saying that this controversial infrastructure project will benefit the Hamas terrorists who continue to exercise effective control over parts of Gaza — along with aid distribution in those areas,” Mr. Tiffany said. “The last thing we ought to do is take steps to ‘fast track’ this misguided effort by side-stepping the same kind of scrutiny we would apply to a project of this cost and logistical complexity here in the United States.”
The letter was addressed to House Appropriations Committee Chair Kay Granger, Texas Republican, and Rep. Rosa DeLauro of Connecticut, the top Democrat on the committee.
• Valerie Richardson can be reached at vrichardson@washingtontimes.com.
Please read our comment policy before commenting.