- The Washington Times - Tuesday, March 12, 2024

A version of this story appeared in the On Background newsletter from The Washington Times. Click here to receive On Background delivered directly to your inbox each Friday.

Irked by reports that federal office buildings sometimes operate at less than 10% capacity, the House on Tuesday approved a use-it-or-lose-it policy, ordering agencies to either get employees back at desks in their office buildings or give up the space.

The legislation would require an average 60% use rate for government buildings and would direct agencies to consolidate their offices to reach that level. Republicans said the bill would goose the government from its extended pandemic emergency haze.

“COVID is over. Either come to work or don’t come to work, but let’s don’t keep these buildings open if nobody is in them,” said Rep. Thomas Massie, Kentucky Republican.

Many Democrats said they agree with the idea of better use of office space, but they worried that the Republicans’ bill was too stringent and would chase good employees out of the federal workforce by forcing them to give up their telework flexibility.

“If we want our federal workforce to be the best in the world, we need to compete. We need to give them the flexibility to work from home, just like other employers do in the private sector,” said Rep. James McGovern, Massachusetts Democrat.

Republicans said they weren’t objecting to where employees wanted to work but didn’t want taxpayers picking up the bill for vacant offices.

“All we’re saying is, my goodness, federal agencies, can you come back to work at least 60%,” said Rep. Scott Perry, Pennsylvania Republican and chief sponsor of the bill. He cited The Washington Times’ reporting on empty offices to support the legislation.

The bill passed on a 217-213 vote, split mostly along party lines. Six Democrats supported the measure, and two Republicans opposed it.

Under the legislation, the government would develop a yardstick for occupancy rates and use sensors as measurements. An amendment adopted during debate Tuesday allows for alternate schedules to be accommodated in the definition.

Agencies that average less than 60% occupancy over a year would have to correct the situation or devise a plan to reduce their space.

Sen. Joni Ernst, Iowa Republican, last year revealed government data showing shocking vacancy rates at the headquarters of major federal departments and agencies.

The Social Security Administration’s office in Baltimore and the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s building in the southwest quadrant of Washington clocked in at 7% use rates. The Small Business Administration had a 9% use rate.

Even the General Services Administration, the government’s chief landlord, was using just 11% of its space in its office near the White House.

The best performer on the list was the State Department, whose Harry S. Truman building had a 49% use rate.

Federal agencies told the Government Accountability Office that they didn’t want to share space because it would mean giving up the political clout that comes with having their own real estate.

Even within agencies, divisions were reluctant to share space, such as conference rooms. Some agencies said they had to keep classified and unclassified work separate.

Rep. Mark Alford, Missouri Republican, said he tried to visit the federal agencies within the jurisdiction of his committee assignments when he first came to Washington last year. The Pentagon let him in, but he said others refused him.

“A sitting member of Congress could not get into the door of these agencies,” he said. “They have been hiding the low numbers of people actually at their desk.”

Ms. Ernst last month challenged Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack on the 11% use rate of his department’s headquarters buildings, historic structures at the southern entrance to downtown, citing a whistleblower who called the office a “ghost town.”

Mr. Vilsack insisted that figure was old, though he didn’t offer updated occupancy data. He said the crux of the issue is that his employees are doing their jobs wherever they are.

“To suggest that they’re not working, I think, is an affront to the hardworking members of the USDA family,” he said.

The White House said it “strongly” objected to the bill but did not threaten a veto.

A policy statement cited hurdles to consolidating departments and agencies, some of which are old and require “major modernization.”

“While the administration believes that the federal real estate portfolio needs to be evaluated and optimized, the administration believes that agencies’ unique missions require individualized approaches to improving space utilization,” said the White House Office of Management and Budget.

Congressional Democrats offered other objections.

Rep. Rick Larsen, Washington Democrat, said much of the federal office space is leased and doesn’t have escape clauses allowing the government to reduce its use. That means the government would be on the hook for the costs anyway.

Mr. McGovern said it was wrong to treat federal food inspectors, who need to be at work sites, the same as pencil pushers in headquarters buildings.

“Heck, members of Congress, we’re not in Washington behind our desk five times a week,” he said.

Rep. Garret Graves, Louisiana Republican, said managers should be able to figure out schedules to stagger when people are in the office.

“That’s fine. Just manage them in a way that maximizes the use of space,” he said.

The empty buildings have caused embarrassing hiccups for the government, including outbreaks of Legionella, the bacterium that causes Legionnaires’ Disease.

The inspector general for the GSA issued a report last year disclosing that Legionella had been detected in six GSA-controlled buildings, including one that led to a case of Legionnaires disease.

That report blamed buildings left empty by pandemic shutdown policies, which meant fewer people were using facilities and water stagnated, creating conditions for bacteria to grow.

In San Francisco, streets surrounding the Speaker Nancy Pelosi Federal Building have been so plagued by crime that one federal agency told employees last year to start working from home. Executive branch agencies have declined to answer questions about the current occupancy of that building.

• Stephen Dinan can be reached at sdinan@washingtontimes.com.

Copyright © 2024 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide