OPINION:
Given the nuclear capability of many countries around the world, direct confrontation could lead to the last world war (“China’s move on Taiwan could come even sooner than projected, U.S. commander warns,” web, Feb. 1).
When some powerful nation wants to beat up on a fellow Goliath, they often use David to do the wetwork. The slingshot will be provided, but no troops will be sent. This appears to be where the line is drawn.
When one’s bombs, missiles and intelligence are used to attack or defend against one’s adversaries, shouldn’t the supplier of these resources share culpability with those who are implementing the destruction? It all seems fine and dandy as long as those involved aren’t placing boots on the ground. I wonder how long it will be before some world power has had enough and decides this rule of war etiquette is complete hogwash. (Remembering the Nord Stream pipeline?)
What will we do if and when China attacks Taiwan? Will we be delivering more bombs and other armament to Taiwan? The geography is not in our favor. If our delivery vessels are attacked, do we engage in direct confrontation with China? War by proxy can ignite a tinderbox that spreads faster than anyone’s ability to extinguish the flames.
SCOTT THOMPSON
Bloomington, Indiana
Please read our comment policy before commenting.