OPINION:
One in 4 Americans owe back taxes, and 56% of Americans surveyed would find an unexpected $1,000 expense ruinous. So why should American taxpayers be expected to fund the World Economic Forum, attended by many of the world’s wealthiest people who fly to the event on their private jets?
Fortunately, Rep. Scott Perry, Pennsylvania Republican, has introduced the Defund Davos Act. The measure would prohibit the U.S. government from funding the World Economic Forum. “The World Economic Forum is steeped in authoritarianism and Marxist ideology,” according to Australian Sen. Alex Antic.
The Defund Davos Act and the WHO Withdrawal Act, introduced by Rep. Andy Biggs, Arizona Republican, deserve support. The unnecessary financial burden that globalist organizations drain from American taxpayers is the least of the reasons that the United States should halt its support of — or even participation in — globalist cabals.
There are three main reasons why I strongly oppose globalist institutions. First, I am concerned that many globalists seek democide. Dennis Meadows, who has served on the faculty of MIT and Dartmouth College and was a keynote speaker at the launch of United Nations University, said that the global population should be reduced to 1 billion or 2 billion people. Mr. Meadows said he hopes that the reduction of some 6 people or 7 billion people will be accomplished in a humane manner. The Cambridge University economist Sir Partha Dasgupta thinks the optimal human population could be as small as 500 million.
While not all globalists are forthright about their attraction to a radical reduction in the world population, they make no bones about wanting to control every aspect of our lives on the pretext of protecting the world from the hoax of climate change. As with so many other cults, such as David Koresh of the Branch Davidians and Jim Jones of the Peoples Temple, today’s cult of globalism instructs us that the only way to avoid climate change-induced Armageddon is to submit to every one of their commandments.
Many of these commandments, such as waging war against farmers and cows, are self-destructive. Are we really to believe that depriving people of food will save humanity? Or should we heed Nobel Prize-winning scientist John Clauser’s admonition that human-induced climate change is a hoax promoted by globalists “to depopulate the planet.”
Fascistic globalists and their domestic disciples have anointed themselves as the populace’s micromanagers. They seem determined to turn the United States into a lockdown nation. They dictate what kind of low-quality and short-lived stoves, air conditioners, washing machines, hair dryers and lightbulbs we can buy. They already control the temperatures in some of our homes. If the “woke” mob has its way, we will soon be restricted from buying gasoline-powered vehicles.
The combination of heightened demands on the electrical grid and the reliance on alternative energy to power that grid will lead us to the dark ages in the form of frequent, if not extended, blackouts. If central bank digital currencies are enforced, we may be penalized for traveling beyond our postmodern ghettos, soon to be better known as 15-minute cities.
Henry David Thoreau warned us about surrendering our liberties to others when he prophetically said, “When others think for you, they will soon stop thinking about you.” Subrogating our decision-making to unaccountable autocrats will not end well. People are difficult to control. As Kim Jong Un, Mao and Stalin realized, smaller populations are easier to manage. Swiss elitists may have come to the same conclusion.
Leaders of globalist organizations are neither elected by nor accountable to U.S. citizens. There are no votes or referendums on the mandates for vaccine administration, vaccine passports, censorship, the banning of meat, or the energy policies the globalists are pushing on the world. The decision-making in some globalist institutions, such as the World Health Organization, is not democratic. There are no appeals processes with these organizations.
Worse yet, these organizations are wildly intertwined. The European Union defers to the WHO. In some cases, deference is given from the WHO to the G7, the G20 or the United Nations, which in turn relies on the WHO or the World Economic Forum for its expertise. Given how incestuous these globalist gangs are, we have no idea who is ramming through policies that will affect every facet of everyone’s lives.
If the globalists are left unchecked, humanity could face a plight similar to that of the Uyghurs in China, where 25% of these Turkic Muslim people are confined to reeducation camps. Most of the other Uyghurs live with surveillance cameras in their homes and are required to host government-appointed minders in their homes and beds. Failure to conform is not tolerated. Every infraction — such as abstaining from alcohol or refusing to eat pork — is reported. The Uyghurs face genocide at the hands of the Chinese Communist Party. Women are forced to submit to sterilization and IUD placement.
As a result, Uyghur birthrates have plunged as much as 90% in rural Xinjiang.
• David Wanetick is CEO of Davos in the Desert, an anti-globalist movement dedicated to providing forums whereby business leaders, thought leaders and government officials share their ideas for safeguarding freedom and liberty.
Please read our comment policy before commenting.