Shoot the drones down

OPINION:

The skies over New Jersey have been littered with strange flying objects for two weeks, and the feds are hiding the truth from terrified Americans or scratching their heads along with the rest of us. Since early December, there have been between 3,000 and 5,000 reports of large drones — some about the size of a pickup truck. They have three or four arms, at the ends of which are bright lights.

The drone I saw over the northwest tip of the state appeared to come toward me and stood perfectly still. Then — in a heartbeat — it was gone. I didn’t immediately call the police but spoke with them through back channels. New Jersey State Police dispatched a helicopter — manned by two troopers — to pursue the beast but not to interfere with it. As their helicopter approached, the drone fled from them and seemed to disappear.

New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy — who had no use for the Bill of Rights during the COVID-19 pandemic four years ago — sees no threat to public safety or peace. The White House — which must know the origin and nature of these things — also professes ignorance. President-elect Donald Trump — in this instance, a man after my own heart — said that if this happens on his watch, he’d order the drones shot down.

Don’t expect that from President Biden. Remember the two weeks in which we all watched a huge Chinese “weather” balloon make its way from Alaska to South Carolina, only to have it shot down over the Atlantic? That manifested Mr. Biden’s attitude about strange and terrifying flying objects.

Can people shoot these beasts out of the sky? The uncomfortable answer is yes and no.

Here is the backstory.

As recently as 2008, the Supreme Court has clarified that the right to self-defense is pre-political. Stated differently, it is a natural right that existed before the government, it exists in the absence of government, it derives from our humanity and the government cannot abridge it absent due process. It is also expressly protected by the Second Amendment to the Constitution.

Thus, since this natural right is akin to the freedom of speech and religion, neither legislation nor executive command nor a constitutional change can take this right away.

Only due process — a jury trial at which the government proves personal individual fault — can interfere with a natural right. A thief who robs a bank has violated the natural rights of the depositors and owners of the bank. The thief has given up his natural right to be free and, upon conviction, loses that right for years. Short of this voluntary waiver of rights by impairing the rights of another, natural rights are real and permanent.

Thomas Jefferson recognized this when he wrote in the Declaration of Independence that we are “endowed by [our] Creator with certain unalienable Rights, among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.” He went on to argue that we have established governments to protect our natural rights — and when the government fails to do so, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it.

In the same Supreme Court opinion in which the court held that self-defense is a natural right, Justice Antonin Scalia wrote that individuals can defend themselves using the same mechanical or technological means as bad guys do or as the government does. This was not always the case. From 1934 until the Scalia opinion in 2008, the court had embraced the myth that the right to self-defense is collective and not individual. Stated differently, under this now-rejected and farcical big government theory, only the government can protect you.

According to Scalia’s opinion, individuals can protect themselves from bad guys and from the government when it fails to protect natural rights.

Now, back to the drones over New Jersey.

The same Supreme Court that ruled that self-defense is a personal, natural, individual right has also ruled that all power in the federal government comes from the Constitution and from no other source. Nowhere in the Constitution did the states cede to Congress control of safety in the airspace over their houses.

Yet Congress has given itself the power to control air safety and then give it away to a federal administrative agency, which is also unmentioned in the Constitution. Stated differently, Congress has purported to emasculate the powers of the states to protect the people in the states.

This explains the New Jersey State Police’s and even the New York Police Department’s reluctance to disable, capture or chase away these drones.

Congress has made us helpless before whoever is terrifying the populace. This is contrary to the reason we have government. The states formed the federal government, not the other way around. When they did so, they delegated only 16 discrete powers to it, and they retained all other powers. Among the powers retained is public safety.

Can Congress negate the power of the states to protect us and simultaneously negate the right of all people to protect themselves? The short answer is no. The lamentable answer is we have allowed Congress to do so.

Will I shoot down the next drone that flies over my home when the state claims it cannot do so and the feds tell me to mind my own business? If I did, I’d be responsible for such an act’s natural and probable consequences, including personal injury and property damage.

The better way to address this is for the states to chase and capture these devices in defiance of an incompetent federal government. If they won’t, I might take my chances with a New Jersey jury.

• To learn more about Judge Andrew Napolitano, visit https://JudgeNap.com.