OPINION:
Democrats finally found the “pee tape” they’ve been promising.
Only it does not involve hookers in a Moscow hotel room six years ago, and former President Donald Trump had nothing to do with it.
“Yeah, you can watch me pee,” says Susanna Gibson, Democrat candidate for the Virginia House of Delegates and star of the newly-surfaced “pee” tape. “Y’all can watch me pee if you tip me and some tokens again I’m raising money for a good cause.”
That last sentence seems to have some grammatical errors. Difficult to diagram. But it’s what she said on the tape. On the Internet website. Where she charged the public to watch her have sexual intercourse as recently as last year.
Astonishingly, Mrs. Gibson now claims her “privacy” was “violated” because people watched the video. Yet, on the tape, she begs them to watch and nakedly grovels for “tokens” in exchange for watching her have sexual intercourse — as well as other strange bedroom performances.
Invasion of privacy? More like Internet gold, baby. You went viral!
Apparently, logic is not one of her qualifications for public office. The 40-year-old mother of two is running for a “swing seat” in the Richmond suburbs. The stay-at-home sex worker and her husband, a lawyer, laid down more public sex tape than the entire Kardashian family combined.
At least Hunter Biden made some feeble effort to keep his sex tapes private. Perhaps if he had instead charged money for them, he would not have had to sell out the Biden family name to the Chinese communists, the Russians, the Ukrainians and the Mexicans.
The fact that Mrs. Gibson now claims to be a victim of state “revenge porn” laws proves she really is the perfect Democrat. Not only is she blindly committed to the cult of victimhood, but she also has no concept of “actions” and “consequences.”
She fits right in with Democrat politicians who today suddenly complain about illegal immigration, violent crime and inflation — after decades of supporting policies to encourage illegal immigration, violent crime and inflation.
Luckily for Mrs. Gibson, she enjoys the “Family Friendly Seal of Approval” from a Democrat lobbying group called Family Friendly Virginia. There is no indication at press time that Family Friendly Virginia has revoked Mrs. Gibson’s “Family Friendly Seal of Approval.”
Does Family Friendly Virginia support all candidates who promote “pee tapes” on the Internet? Does Family Friendly Virginia support all the stars of Internet websites that are closely linked to the diabolical scourge of child sex trafficking around the globe?
Their website does not say.
But Mrs. Gibson’s campaign for the Virginia House of Delegates does boast that the “Family Friendly Seal of Approval” means she supports “quality, affordable child care” and “quality, affordable long-term care.” This gets us into all the important public policy questions raised by Mrs. Gibson’s “pee tape.”
Does the brothel where Mrs. Gibson performed her sex tapes for the public include child care for her children? Does “quality, affordable long-term care” include coverage for sexually transmitted diseases such as syphilis and gonorrhea? (OK, that last question was gratuitous. I just like to include the words “syphilis” and “gonorrhea” in political columns every chance I get because these people deserve it and Bill Clinton has been out of office for over 20 years.)
Another important public policy question is whether Mrs. Gibson — running as a member of the higher-taxes Democratic Party — paid taxes on the income she earned as a sex worker on the Internet. Just because you are on all fours doesn’t mean you don’t owe your “fair share.”
I mean, we tax the hell out of a brave 7-Eleven clerk who risks her life every night behind the cash register in lawless cities run by Democrats. So why shouldn’t Mrs. Gibson have to pay her “fair share” of tokens for sex to the government?
Mental disease and hypocrisy aside, Mrs. Gibson still should not be in the Virginia House of Delegates.
And just to be clear: It’s not “having sex” that disqualifies Mrs. Gibson from public office. After all, that still remains the most popular way for humans to have children.
Rather, what disqualifies Mrs. Gibson from public office is the deranged, creepy and invasive need to share the performance of “having sex” with the innocent citizenry.
Once you let these political exhibitionists drag us into their bedroom, it is only a matter of time before they want to follow you into yours. They want to be in your bedroom, your bathroom, your kitchen and your medicine cabinet.
These people want to regulate your light bulbs, your toilets, your dishwashers. They want to tell you what you can eat and what kind of car you drive. These people want to force you and your children to take whatever vaccines they order you to.
They want to deprive you of your right to defend yourself and your family.
They want to force you to pay the university bills of other people’s children and force you to pay for other people’s health care.
And then they will tell you it is none of your business after they decide to cut off your children’s genitals.
The only house Mrs. Gibson belongs in is a whorehouse.
• Charles Hurt is the opinion editor at The Washington Times.
Please read our comment policy before commenting.