The bloody campaign to crush Hamas is perhaps the most ambitious undertaking of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s decades of rule.
Growing evidence indicates it may also be his political swan song.
Even as the nation rallies together after Hamas’ horrific Oct. 7 terrorist assault and while a shaky cease-fire and prisoner exchange plays out, a recent survey showed Mr. Netanyahu’s approval rating among the Israeli public at a dismal 22%. Even fewer Israelis support the prime minister’s coalition government in the aftermath of the attack.
Other polls show Benny Gantz trouncing Mr. Netanyahu when Israelis are asked who is better suited to be prime minister. Mr. Gantz is Mr. Netanyahu’s center-left political rival turned war Cabinet colleague.
Even during a major war in the Gaza Strip, with thousands of troops in the field and hundreds of Israelis still held captive by Hamas, some of Mr. Netanyahu’s critics are publicly calling for the seemingly bulletproof Israeli prime minister to step aside and let a new government lead the campaign to eradicate Hamas.
The Oct. 7 attack is rightly viewed as Israel’s 9/11, analysts say, but the aftermath in Israel is far different from American sentiment 22 years ago when President George W. Bush and New York City Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani gained phenomenal popularity and helped channel the nation’s grief and anger.
SEE ALSO: Four-year-old American girl among hostages released by Hamas
Mr. Netanyahu was a polarizing figure in Israel long before the Hamas massacre, and his divisive image in Washington and much of the developing world has left the Jewish state scrambling to find friends and supporters abroad.
“I’m not sure he is the figure that has brought the country together,” said Jonathan Schanzer, senior vice president for research at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies. “I think the sorrow over the slaughter of over 1,200 Israelis has brought the country together. I don’t think there has been a galvanizing political figure yet to emerge from this.”
In fact, Mr. Schanzer said, questions are mounting about whether Mr. Netanyahu’s policies, particularly his wildly controversial judicial reform plan, may have sent a signal of vulnerability to Hamas.
“Did the perception of Israeli weakness contribute to the Hamas decision to launch the 10/7 assault? That has not yet been revealed,” Mr. Schanzer said. “We had 10 months of massive protests on the streets of Israel, where the country really looked like it was pulling apart at the seams. … One got the distinct sense the country was on the verge of some kind of civil conflict.
“It certainly contributed to a sense that Israel was weaker, perhaps less prepared for battle,” Mr. Schanzer said.
Mr. Netanyahu has avoided taking direct responsibility for the apparent Israeli intelligence and security failures leading up to Oct. 7, though some of his top lieutenants have acknowledged government failings. He insists that he and all other prominent Israeli leaders will be forced to account for the breach at an undetermined point.
SEE ALSO: National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan ducks question on conditions on aid to Israel
“This whole question will be addressed after the war,” Mr. Netanyahu told CNN this month. “Did people ask Franklin Roosevelt after Pearl Harbor that question? Did people ask George Bush after the surprise attack of Sept. 11? It’s a question that needs to be asked.
“We’re going to answer all these questions, including me. I’m going to be asked tough questions,” he said. “Right now, I think what we have to do is unite the country for one purpose, one purpose alone, to achieve victory.”
Courting controversy
Even members of the Israel Defense Forces have been pulled into the political controversy.
Five months ago, hundreds of IDF reservists were marching in the streets of Tel Aviv and threatening to refuse to report for duty if Mr. Netanyahu’s government pressed ahead with its judicial reform plan. Critics said the plan would remove a critical check on Mr. Netanyahu’s nationalist, ultra-religious coalition government.
Such unprecedented scenes suggested that the hawkish, tough-talking Mr. Netanyahu finally might have gone too far.
Mr. Netanyahu’s political obituary has been prematurely written many other times, but the judicial reform plan seemed to spark unprecedented resentment from Israeli society. Among other things, the plan would give the nation’s governing coalition power over judicial appointments. Mr. Netanyahu’s government also wants laws that would give the Knesset power to overrule Israeli Supreme Court decisions that invalidate Knesset-approved measures and put new limits on judicial reviews of some laws.
Some of Mr. Netanyahu’s critics said the plan was a direct response to criminal corruption charges against the prime minister.
“He wants to get out of this trial,” former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak said in an interview this year with Foreign Policy magazine. “Bibi decided to attack the judicial system, to threaten its independence, to destroy it” for his benefit.
In March, Mr. Netanyahu fired Defense Minister Yoav Gallant after Mr. Gallant publicly questioned the pace of the reform push. Mr. Netanyahu reversed that decision weeks later. Mr. Gallant is now a key member of the prime minister’s war Cabinet, which also includes Mr. Gantz, a longtime political rival. The three men are projecting a unified front of wartime decision-making.
Israel’s parliamentary system makes it hard to oust a coalition with a majority in the Knesset even if public support collapses. Mr. Netanyahu’s opponents would have to pass a “constructive no-confidence” vote that removes the prime minister and elects another one. Finding a consensus candidate has proved difficult.
Losing faith?
Anger and frustration with Mr. Netanyahu seem to be bubbling beneath the surface in Israel, even with attention turned to the Oct. 7 attack and the subsequent war against Hamas.
The assault and its aftermath may spell trouble for Mr. Netanyahu, now in his third stint as Israeli leader. He also served from 1996 to 1999 and from 2009 to June 2021.
Before the attack, public trust in Mr. Netanyahu’s government appeared shaky. Mr. Netanyahu returned to power last December after working behind the scenes to whip up opposition to former Prime Minister Naftali Bennett and an eight-party governing alliance united almost entirely by its desire to push Mr. Netanyahu out of power. That alliance governed Israel briefly before its collapse, paving the way for Mr. Netanyahu’s return with support from a broad coalition of right-wing and ultra-religious parties.
Polls show that Mr. Netanyahu’s coalition would collapse if elections were held today. A poll released this month by Israel’s Channel 12 found that the pro-Netanyahu coalition would win just 45 seats in the Knesset, compared with the 64 it won in November 2022 elections.
That survey also found that Israelis prefer Mr. Gantz over Mr. Netanyahu as prime minister, 41% to 25%. Mr. Netanyahu was tied with political opposition leader Yair Lapid, 29% to 29% when respondents were asked to choose between the two men. A separate Israel Democracy Institute survey gave Mr. Netanyahu a 22% approval rating, while the government as a whole came in at just 14%.
Mr. Lapid refused to join Mr. Netanyahu’s war Cabinet when it was established last month. In the weeks since, he has grown increasingly vocal about what he views as the need for new leadership in Israel.
“The time has come. We need to establish a national reconstruction government. Likud will lead it, Netanyahu and the extremists will be replaced, over 90 members of the Knesset will be partners in the coalition for healing and reconnection,” he said in a social media post this month.
Polls also show that Israelis overwhelmingly believe Mr. Netanyahu should assume responsibility for the Oct. 7 attack. A survey by Israel’s Maariv newspaper last month found that 80% of Israelis believe the prime minister should publicly accept some responsibility.
He hasn’t for several possible reasons, analysts say.
“You could say that he is now a wartime prime minister who has a mandate and he has to win and that he is not allowing himself to get drawn into the distraction of politics at a time that is crucial for the country. And then I’ve heard others say that this is a man who is refusing to accept responsibility for his own failure, which, of course, resonates among his opponents,” Mr. Schanzer said. “Which one is right? I’ll leave that to journalists to decide.”
Mr. Netanyahu shows no signs of giving up power on his own. Asked point-blank at a recent press conference whether he was considering resigning, he replied, “The only thing that I’m going to have resigned is Hamas. We’re going to resign them to the dustbin of history. That’s my goal. That’s my responsibility.”
• Ben Wolfgang can be reached at bwolfgang@washingtontimes.com.
Please read our comment policy before commenting.