PARIS — Activists wearing masks depicting President Emmanuel Macron urged France on Thursday to change its position and endorse a law proposed by the European Union that would define rape as sex without consent in the bloc’s 27 countries.
The demonstrators gathered in downtown Paris on the eve of International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women to apply pressure on the French head of state.
The European Commission, the EU’s executive arm, proposed legislation last year to make consent-based rape laws consistent across the bloc, and to introduce a common set of penalties.
While other details of the directive, which include a proposal for the criminalization of female genital mutilation and cyberbullying, seem to gather a consensus among the 27 member countries, the definition of rape based on the lack of consent is deeply divisive.
According to Human Rights Watch, only 13 EU member states use consent-based definitions to criminalize rape. Many others still require the use of force, or threat, to mete out punishment. French law, for instance, considers that a rape can be considered to have occurred when “an act of sexual penetration or an oral-genital act is committed on a person, with violence, coercion, threat or surprise.”
“I’m here today because it infuriates me to see that our criminal law is not up to the task, that today it allows for rape to happen,” said Sirine Sehil, a criminal law attorney. “It does not take into account our consent, our will, what we, as women, want.”
The Paris action, where a banner said “Only yes means yes,” was organized by groups including nonprofit organization Avaaz and the European Women Lobby, an umbrella group of women’s nongovernmental associations in Europe.
France is among some EU countries that argue that the issue of rape is a matter of criminal law, and therefore falls within the competence of member countries, not the EU.
France has taken steps in recent years to toughen punishment for rape and sexual misconduct, including setting 15 as the age of consent. But while Macron has promised to tackle deadly domestic abuse and other violence against women, activists say France still has a long way to go.
Earlier this week, Human Rights Watch sent a letter to French government officials saying: “While we recognize that France aims to protect women’s rights and combat violence against women and girls, at present it regrettably remains in the company of member states including Poland and Hungary and lags behind member states such as Spain, Belgium, Germany, Ireland, Sweden, Denmark and Greece in amending its criminal law.’’
“This is an opportunity for France to not only take the necessary steps toward meeting its own international human rights obligations, but to lead the entire EU forward in its fight to combat violence against women and girls,’’ the letter said.
Last year, Spain’s parliament passed a sexual consent law that was seen by many in Europe as trailblazing for victims’ rights. But the law inadvertently reduced prison terms for hundreds of sexual offenders, leading to widespread criticism.
One of the biggest tests for the law will be the ongoing criminal investigation at the country’s top court over the non-consensual kiss that Spain’s former soccer federation boss, Luis Rubiales, imposed on leading national player Jenni Hermoso at the celebration of the team’s Women’s World Cup victory.
Many European lawmakers want the definition based on non-consensual sex to be adopted continent-wide.
“It is the only way to guarantee that all EU countries put into their national law that sex without consent is rape, and that all European women are equally protected,” the Socialists and Democrats group said in a statement.
The pro-Europe Renew Europe group rued the deadlock among member countries, arguing that the inclusion of sex without consent in the law is crucial to set minimum punishment.
“Without a harmonized definition of rape, this directive would be an empty vase,” said Lucia Duris Nicholsonova, a lawmaker from Slovakia. “We need a common approach across all member states. A woman raped cannot be considered only ‘oversensitive’ in one member state, while in the same case in another member state she would be considered a victim of a crime. We have to fight for all victims to have equal access to justice.”
___
Samuel Petrequin reported from Brussels. Aritz Parra contributed to this report from Madrid.
Please read our comment policy before commenting.