House lawmakers advanced a bill Wednesday to permanently place fentanyl on the most restrictive list of drugs, though its path to becoming law remains bumpy because of a partisan rift over mandatory criminal penalties.
The Energy and Commerce subcommittee on health voted 17-10 in support of the HALT Fentanyl Act, which would permanently place fentanyl-related substances on the Schedule I list of drugs with a high risk of abuse.
The idea is to make it clear that all forms of the deadly synthetic opioid are restricted and subject to criminal penalties and should not be created in the first place.
Energy and Commerce Committee Chairwoman Cathy McMorris Rodgers, Washington Republican, said the Republican bill sponsored by Reps. Morgan Griffith of Virginia and Robert Latta of Ohio would “make sure law enforcement can keep these weapons-grade poisons off our streets.”
The subcommittee vote moved the bill closer to a full committee markup and House passage under the new Republican majority.
Democrats say they are worried that the measure would lead to mandatory minimum sentences for fentanyl offenses, making it difficult for judges to appraise each case on its individual merits. Rep. Angie Craig of Minnesota was the only Democrat on the subcommittee to support the bill Wednesday, and liberal objections could block the bill from clearing the Senate and reaching President Biden’s desk.
“This is unfortunate because I think we could also get to a bipartisan bill if the Republicans would come to the table,” said Rep. Anna Eshoo, California Democrat. “We just need to make sure the policy on mandatory minimums is revised to avoid continuing the ineffective and harmful policies of the past.”
Fentanyl is used to treat severe pain in cancer patients and others, but it also is produced illicitly in clandestine labs — often in Mexico with Chinese chemicals — and trafficked across the southern U.S. border. It is pressed into fake pills or cut with other drugs, so drug users in the U.S. might take fentanyl without knowing it.
Roughly 70,000 of the 107,000 overdose deaths in the U.S. were linked to fentanyl in 2021, the most recent year for which complete data is available.
Experts say permanent scheduling would result in stiffer penalties under guidelines from the Sentencing Commission and send a signal to China and Mexico that the U.S. is serious about tackling the fentanyl problem, even as it pressures those nations to do more.
Mr. Biden told Congress to send him a bill that permanently puts illicit fentanyl-related substances on Schedule I before temporary scheduling expires in December 2024. During his State of the Union address, he alluded to the effort by calling for stiffer penalties for fentanyl traffickers alongside efforts to beef up drug screenings at ports of entry.
Mr. Biden and his Democratic allies want to exempt quantity-related fentanyl offenses from mandatory criminal penalties. They say judges need flexibility. The administration said mandatory minimum penalties should apply in cases in which fentanyl offenses result in bodily harm or death.
Republicans say the Democrats’ proposed reforms would let traffickers duck serious consequences and embolden Mexican cartels that ship pills into the U.S. They shot down Democratic amendments that sought to eliminate mandatory penalties in certain situations and said Congress can enact fairer sentencing rules later through separate legislation.
Liberal lawmakers said they fear people who handle fentanyl-related substances for medical purposes will be swept up and punished. Republicans said the bill is written in a way that allows researchers to study fentanyl.
While the bill is advancing through the House, Democrats’ concerns could delay the effort in the Democratic-led Senate.
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Richard J. Durbin, Illinois Democrat, said this month that he supported an effort decades ago to stiffen penalties for crack cocaine, only to regret it.
“The price of the drug on the street went down, the usage went up and we filled federal prisons primarily with African American prisoners,” Mr. Durbin told Attorney General Merrick Garland at a recent hearing. “It backfired on us. I don’t want to make that same mistake when it comes to fentanyl.”
Rep. Frank Pallone, New Jersey Democrat, said mandatory sentences have “created a lot of problems over the years “and the House bill as written “stands no chance of becoming law.”
Mr. Latta, a chief sponsor of the bill, said Congress can’t delay a solution any longer.
“The argument [around] mandatory minimums is null and void when you’re killing Americans, no matter how large or small the quantity of drugs,” he said. “Let me be clear: If you’re intentionally lacing fentanyl into illicit narcotics, you are committing murder and should be held accountable.”
• Tom Howell Jr. can be reached at thowell@washingtontimes.com.
Please read our comment policy before commenting.