The White House was on the defensive Wednesday as criticism mounted that President Biden should be doing more to help Ukraine fend off Russia’s invasion.
Hours after Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy electrified a joint session of Congress with a virtual plea for more U.S. military help, a graphic video of his country’s suffering, and soaring rhetoric that invoked the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr., Pearl Harbor and the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, Mr. Biden sought to counter complaints that he has been too weak on Russia by escalating his rhetoric and announcing an additional $800 million in security assistance to Ukraine.
Perhaps reflecting the pressure to present a tougher front, Mr. Biden for the first time explicitly called Russian President Vladimir Putin a “war criminal.” He made the remark to a reporter as he left an unrelated White House event. A Kremlin spokesman quickly denounced the president’s language as “unacceptable and unforgivable rhetoric.”
Administration officials moved quickly to clean up Mr. Biden’s outburst. White House press secretary Jen Psaki and State Department spokesman Ned Price said later that the president was “speaking from his heart” when he made the remarks about Mr. Putin, and Ms. Psaki noted that there is a legal process for determining war crimes.
“We’ve all seen barbaric acts, horrific acts by a foreign dictator in a country that is threatening and taking the lives of civilians, impacting hospitals, women who are pregnant, journalists and others,” she said.
The back-and-forth came on a day when Russian forces fatally shot 10 civilians standing in line for bread in the besieged city of Chernihiv, Russian artillery bombed a theater where Ukrainian civilians were reportedly sheltering in the port city of Mariupol, the capital Kyiv faced a fresh round of shelling from nearby Russian forces, and NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg said the alliance is considering adding “substantially more forces” to its eastern flank in light of the escalating Russian operation in Ukraine.
SEE ALSO: Tanking? Russia’s struggles raise new questions over armored advantage
Pentagon officials said they have seen “increased naval activity” in the south near the key port of Odessa, including vessels identified as tank landing ships that could be used in an amphibious assault. Like most of the country’s other major cities, Odessa remains in Ukrainian hands three weeks after the Russian invasion.
“It could be to prepare the way for a ground assault,” a senior Defense Department official said in a background briefing. “We would not be surprised to see them interested in Odessa, given its strategic location.”
Capturing Odessa would put Moscow a giant step closer to closing off Ukraine’s access to the Black Sea. Russian troops have been fought to a standstill by the much-smaller Ukrainian military. On Monday, however, they were largely unopposed while landing at a spot on the Sea of Azov.
Russia has fired more than 980 missiles since the invasion, U.S. officials estimate. But Mr. Putin’s decision to invade is coming at an ever-higher price. Moscow has poured about 75% of its ground combat units into the fight, and the casualties have been staggering, officials said.
“Every day, they are experiencing losses of equipment, aircraft and people,” the Pentagon official said. “We’ve definitely seen them have discussions about what they might need to do to resupply — and that includes manpower.”
Separately, Ukrainian and Russian negotiators held a third straight day of direct talks. The head of the Russian delegation said Moscow is weighing a diplomatic compromise under which Ukraine could become an officially neutral country with its own military, along the lines of Sweden or Austria. Vladimir Medinsky, Moscow’s top negotiator, said the preservation of Ukraine’s neutral status and the size of its military are the topics under consideration.
SEE ALSO: Russia’s invasion of Ukraine stalled on all fronts, U.K. military says
Mr. Zelenskyy’s government has apparently rejected Russia’s proposal of a Findlandization of Ukraine. Mykhailo Podolyak, Ukraine’s top negotiator, said any talks to end fighting should focus on security guarantees instead, according to the English-language Moscow Times newspaper.
“Ukraine is now in a direct state of war with Russia. Consequently, the model can only be ‘Ukrainian’ and only on legally verified security guarantees,” Mr. Podolyak said, the Moscow Times reported.
White House frustration
The administration’s frustration with the criticism of Mr. Biden’s performance was on full display at a combative daily press briefing, where Ms. Psaki vigorously insisted the White House has not pulled its punches against Russia or failed to give Mr. Zelenskyy and his embattled government what they say they need to prevent a Russian takeover.
“We have done more economic sanctions and put in place more financial consequences than we have in any circumstance ever in the world,” she told reporters. “So I wouldn’t say that is holding back in any capacity.”
Including the aid announced Wednesday, the Biden administration said it has provided more than $1 billion in military and other support to Ukraine this week and more than $2 billion since the crisis began.
The U.S. support “is about making sure Ukraine will never be a victory for Putin, no matter what advances he makes on the battlefield,” Mr. Biden said in his address.
The U.S. package of military assistance will include anti-tank missiles and more of the portable air defenses that the U.S. has already provided to Ukraine, including Javelin and Stinger missiles.
Still, Mr. Biden stopped short of granting all of Mr. Zelenskyy’s requests. The U.S. and NATO continue to reject any idea of enforcing a no-fly zone over Ukraine or sending used MiG fighter jets to bolster Ukraine’s air defenses. They say the move would provoke Mr. Putin and risk a direct war between Russian and NATO forces.
Mr. Zelenskyy appealed again for the U.S. and its allies to provide air cover. Sviatoslav Yurash, a member of Ukraine’s parliament, said a no-fly zone over Ukraine is his country’s most significant need. U.S. officials estimate Russia is flying some 200 sorties over Ukraine daily, compared with just five to 10 for the outmatched Ukrainian air forces.
“Our essential request is a no-fly zone because Russia is using its overwhelming air force to cause havoc and destruction in our country,” Mr. Yurash told The Washington Times in a phone interview. “It is our unyielding request time and time again.”
“The big thing we keep repeating is the no-fly zone because of the reality of Russian air power,” he said. “They are using it to kill Ukraine citizens in numbers we haven’t seen since the Second World War.”
It’s not clear whether the moves Wednesday will satisfy Mr. Biden’s critics on Capitol Hill. Republicans portrayed Mr. Biden as a step behind on Ukraine and accused him of being too slow to take on Mr. Putin.
“President Biden needs to step up his game right now before it’s too late,” Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, Kentucky Republican, told reporters. “I think comparing Zelenskyy to Biden is depressing. We’re not doing nearly enough quickly enough to help the Ukrainians.”
Mr. McConnell said the administration has “discouraged” NATO countries from taking more aggressive action in Ukraine.
Mr. Biden is hearing calls from within his own party to do more to assist Ukraine. Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, New Hampshire Democrat, last week urged Mr. Biden not to stand in the way of a Polish proposal to ship its MiG fighter jets to Kyiv via a U.S. air base in Germany for transshipment on to Kyiv.
Ms. Psaki was peppered with questions about the level of support for Ukraine. She bristled as reporters grilled her on the decision to nix the Polish offer. At one point, she snapped, “We’ve spoken to that approximately 167 times.”
• Dave Boyer contributed to this article, which is based in part on wire service reports.
• Mike Glenn can be reached at mglenn@washingtontimes.com.
• Jeff Mordock can be reached at jmordock@washingtontimes.com.
Please read our comment policy before commenting.