The World Trade Organization said former President Donald Trump’s tariffs on steel and aluminum imports broke global trade rules, dismissing his claims of national security concerns to justify them.
The WTO made the ruling following complaint cases brought forth by China, Norway, Switzerland, and Turkey. Two other challenges brought by India and Russia remain pending.
The WTO said the national security argument over the tariffs was flawed because they did not come “at a time of war or other emergency.”
The Biden administration condemned the ruling and said it plans to keep Mr. Trump’s tariffs in place.
“The Biden administration is committed to preserving U.S. national security by ensuring the long-term viability of our steel and aluminum industries,” said Adam Hodge, assistant U.S. trade representative.
Mr. Hodge added that the WTO dispute settlement system should be “fundamentally reform[ed.]”
“The United States has held the clear and unequivocal position, for over 70 years, that issues of national security cannot be reviewed in WTO dispute settlement and the WTO has no authority to second guess the ability of a WTO member to respond to a wide range of threats to its security,” Mr. Hodge said.
The WTO said the U.S. must bring its trade policy into compliance or risk retaliatory tariffs by the countries who brought the complaints.
The U.S. could appeal the decision, though it would leave the dispute in limbo over the government blocking appointments to the WTO’s appellate body, which hears appeals.
Some lawmakers also vocally criticized the decision by the WTO.
“The Section 232 Tariffs are the last remaining bulwark against China and Russia ruining northern Minnesota’s economy by flooding our shores with cheap, dirty steel,” said Rep. Pete Stauber, Minnesota Republican. “The WTO is wrong, our steel supply chains are a strategic national security concern.”
• Mica Soellner can be reached at msoellner@washingtontimes.com.
Please read our comment policy before commenting.