- The Washington Times - Friday, August 12, 2022

Former President Donald Trump is under investigation for violations of the Espionage Act and agents seized 11 sets of classified materials from his Mar-a-Lago estate earlier this week, according to a copy of the search warrant released Friday.

The warrant authorized the FBI raid Monday on Mr. Trump’s residence at the private Mar-a-Lago club in Palm Beach, Florida, setting off a partisan firestorm over the first-ever federal search of a former president’s home. The severity of the crime, which harkens back to the FBI’s longtime probe of Trump-Russia collusion, promises to further fuel Republicans’ outrage over the Biden administration’s pursuit of the former president.

The Espionage Act is a federal law that bars the unauthorized retention of national security information that could benefit a foreign adversary or harm the U.S. It also makes it a crime to destroy or hide a federal government document, or unlawfully remove government materials.

Under federal law, anyone convicted of violating the Espionage Act could face a $10,000 fine and a 20-year prison sentence. It is unclear from the search warrant how investigators believed Mr. Trump may have violated the statute, which dates back to World War I.

READ THE SEARCH WARRANT

A property receipt released by the court Friday shows that the FBI removed 11 sets of documents from Mr. Trump’s home, including some labeled “top secret.” That’s the highest classification level issued by the U.S. government.


SEE ALSO: Magistrate had full authority to approve unprecedented search at Mar-a-Lago, legal scholars say


Agents removed roughly 28 boxes from Mr. Trump’s estate. Among the material seized in the raid were four sets of top secret documents, three sets of secret documents and three confidential documents, according to the list.

One set of documents was marked “various classified/TS/SCI documents,” which is government shorthand for “top secret, sensitive compartmented information.”

However, what was contained in those sets of classified and top secret materials remains a mystery.

Also seized in the search is an item labeled “Info re: President of France, and an item related to Mr. Trump granting clemency to longtime associate Roger Stone.

Other items are described in the property receipt in vague terms, including “leatherbound box of documents,” “binder of photos,” and “handwritten note.”’

The Washington Post reported Thursday that investigators were seeking classified documents related to nuclear weapons, but the warrant made no mention of nuclear secrets.


SEE ALSO: FBI seized 11 sets of classified documents in Trump search: Reports


Mr. Trump also insisted that the report was untrue, calling it a hoax. He said all the material was no longer classified, and his lawyers have said that he declassified the documents before leaving office.

Republicans said they were pleased with the release of the search warrant, but called for the Justice Department to make public the affidavit, which lays out all sorts of tantalizing details about the investigation of Mr. Trump, including why prosecutors thought evidence of a crime could be found at Mar-a-Lago and why they needed to execute the raid.

“Where’s the affidavit? We still need to see the affidavit,” Sen. Lindsay Graham, South Carolina Republican, wrote on Twitter. 

Mr. Trump said the Justice Department could have had all of the material without conducting a raid on his home. He also insisted that he was cooperating with investigators, saying the search was an unnecessary escalation.

“Number one, it was all declassified. Number two, they didn’t need to ‘seize’ anything,” Mr. Trump said in a statement. “They could have had it anytime they wanted without playing politics and breaking into Mar-a-Lago. It was in secured storage, with an additional lock put on as per their request. They could have had it anytime they wanted—and that includes LONG ago. ALL THEY HAD TO DO WAS ASK.” 

Accusations of a politicized FBI forced Attorney General Merrick Garland on Thursday to make a rare public statement to insist the Trump probe was above board.

“Faithful adherence to the rule of law is the bedrock principle of the Justice Department and of our democracy,” Mr. Garland said. “Upholding the rule of law means applying the law evenly without fear or favor. Under my watch, that is precisely what the Justice Department is doing.”

The search warrant also detailed that FBI agents searched Mr. Trump’s “45 Office” as well as “other structures or buildings” at Mar-a Lago that could be used to store boxes and documents.

Mr. Trump’s attorney Christina Bobb, signed the property receipts, for documents agents seized at Mar-a-Lago on Monday at 6:19 p.m., at the end of the search.

The documents were disclosed Friday afternoon after Mr. Trump and his legal team announced they would not oppose the Justice Department’s motion to unseal the search warrant and property inventory.

In a brief, one-page motion Mr. Trump’s legal team said the former president “does not object” to the government’s motion.

The move was widely expected after Mr. Trump himself posted on his social media platform late Thursday night that he will not oppose the release of documents related to the search of Mar-a-Lago.

“Not only will I not oppose the release of documents related to the unAmerican, unwarranted, and unnecessary raid … I am going a step further by ENCOURAGING the immediate release of those documents,” he said in a statement on Truth Social.

It is highly unusual for a federal judge to order the release of a search warrant, but it is also very rare for the Justice Department to make such a request.

According to the Justice Department’s filing, the heightened public interest in the case justifies its unsealing. However, the department also made it clear that Mr. Trump should have an opportunity to weigh in if the materials could cause harm if they are made public.

• Jeff Mordock can be reached at jmordock@washingtontimes.com.

Copyright © 2024 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.