U.S. Attorney John Durham said Monday he disagrees with the Justice Department inspector general’s conclusion that the FBI was justified in 2016 when it launched an investigation into President Trump’s campaign.
Mr. Durham was tasked by Attorney General William P. Barr earlier this year to oversee a separate investigation into the origins of the Russia probe. His investigation is covering much of the same territory as Justice Department Inspector General Michael E. Horowitz.
In a bombshell report released Monday, Mr. Horowitz said the FBI had enough information to open the Russia investigation.
Mr. Durham says he’s reached a different conclusion.
“Based on the evidence collected to date, and while our investigation is ongoing, last month we advised the Inspector General that we do not agree with some of the report’s conclusions as to predication and how the FBI case was opened,” Mr. Durham said in a statement.
Mr. Durham noted the inspector general’s authority was limited to information within the Justice Department, while his investigation culled evidence from “other persons and entities both in the U.S. and outside of the U.S.”
DOCUMENT: Read the report from the DOJ Office of the Inspector General
• Jeff Mordock can be reached at jmordock@washingtontimes.com.
Please read our comment policy before commenting.