OPINION:
It’s difficult to have a reasonable conversation about sexual mores in the Age of Trump. We could start with the “Access Hollywood” tape, made in 2005 when Donald Trump was the star of a different kind of reality show than the one he’s the star of now. His vulgar boasts about how to seduce women did not prevent his election as president.
Enough voters understood that he thrived in a contemporary culture of macho manhood, which many hoped was receding but knew was far from finished. If Donald Trump was still on the retro side of public sexual attitudes, there were many men (and women) keeping him company.
Now a porn star on the female side of those retro attitudes attempts to rise to a higher pay grade and porn-glam aura, with credible tales of intimate relations with the president, which she says began a decade ago. This may cast the rest of us as voyeurs, but it doesn’t stop anyone from reading all about it.
Reporters interview her with barely concealed prurience trying to play presidential “gotcha.” She’s scheduled to appear on “60 Minutes” Sunday, which gives her a prestigious platform to titillate with tales of an X-rated presidential performance.
Stormy Daniels (born Stephanie Gregory Clifford) exemplifies the equal opportunity female exploiting those retro-sex attitudes, an enterprising woman using prevailing mores to her advantage. She makes no complaint of harassment. She concedes she was a willing player, and sees no harm in turning a romp into an investment.
The retro sexual standards that the Donald enjoyed with Stormy are common among the men found at exclusive golf clubs and fashionable restaurants wearing an expensive woman as arm candy. Both arm and candy are usually satisfied with brief flings into hedonism. Moral judgment has always been tempered by double standards among the rich, famous and powerful.
Jack Kennedy as president flourished in the retro system, and he was likely the last presidential womanizer who would be protected by both women and the press. He kept suites for his women at the Woodner, an apartment hotel on upper 16th Street NW in the capital, a conveniently brief ride down the street to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. Jackie, like Hillary Clinton later, knew of her husband’s infidelities, but the two first ladies handled things differently.
Rumors about Jack, brother Bobby and Marilyn Monroe still enliven the pop-history version of how Marilyn died. But Jack’s gracefully articulated politics, his good looks and studied New England manners, bolstered by a luxury lifestyle supported by daddy’s money, conspired to protect the Kennedy name.
That was in a century and a culture now vanished. Now powerful men who expose themselves, literally and figuratively, face a new kind of push-back. While women in Hollywood and the media are largely credited with driving changes in attitudes toward sex, the targeted villains have been selected with care.
Donald Trump has none of the savoir faire of a Kennedy and he practices the wrong politics to expect a break from the media. But few of his constituents seem to care about his adventures with a porn star, or anyone else, beyond how saucy tales can be used against him.
Third-wave attitudes have splintered feminism with the early success of the #MeToo movement. The first wave was launched by suffragettes of the late-19th century and the early years of the 20th who only wanted the vote. The second wave was ignited by Betty Friedan and the women’s liberation movement in the 1960s. The third wave is young, and it’s sometimes difficult to discern distinctions between sexual assault and merely the sending of mixed messages.
If Jack Kennedy was the knight in shining armor at a time when a rich, glamorous, powerful man could get away with almost anything, Donald Trump arrives on the scene when a man, no matter his status, is suspect merely by virtue (or vice) of his sex. Third wave feminism began with the toppling of Harvey Weinstein, the colossus of Hollywood, and it set off aftershocks that punished even the likes of comedian Aziz Ansari, who was publicly humiliated simply for being a lousy lover.
The porn-star charges against the president are specific and lodged at a moment when there’s a vacuum of feminist leadership. The president vanquished Hillary, who then sang a remarkable swan song of her authorship. In India last week she claimed she lost white women and the election because their husbands and boyfriends told them how to vote.
Stormy Daniels is playing her Trump card before the moment cools. But great expectations, as author Gail Collins observes, “give birth to great disappointments.” Stormy can’t expect fair weather and smooth sailing.
• Suzanne Fields is a columnist for The Washington Times and is nationally syndicated.
Please read our comment policy before commenting.