Recent editorials from South Carolina newspapers:
___
Feb. 20
The Index-Journal of Greenwood on discussing race, religion and other issues:
Will one discussion solve everything? Anything? Probably not.
How about two? Three?
Does the size of the discussion group matter? Probably not. They’re the ones most interested in the topic.
But none of this precludes the need for discussion, especially when it comes to race relations. True, there was not a large turnout Sunday at the Benjamin E. Mays Historic Preservation Site, but it is encouraging that even 16 people saw fit to carve out part of their Sunday for such a discussion.
Sunday’s was the first of a three-month series, “Let’s Talk About Race in America,” hosted by the Greenwood County Library System. We agree with one of the participants, Cozetta Williams’ assessment of the first session, and hope she’s correct regarding the next.
“There’s still hope here because of conversations like this one,” she said. “Next time, there will be more people because those of us that were here will say ’Come on, you’ve got to come to this to have a discussion.’”
It might be well and good to have camps, much in the way we have political parties that have decidedly different platforms and philosophies, but even political parties with deep divisions can find reason to meet somewhere in the middle to discuss their differences and try to achieve compromise.
We need to see a return to that. On Capitol Hill. In discussions about religion. About race relations. And yes, about mass shootings.
Coming to the table for frank and open conversation in an effort to find areas of agreement and develop better understanding, with the eventual outcome being that gains and inroads are made, that forward motion is made. Isn’t that truly what the art of the deal should look like?
Online: http://www.indexjournal.com/
___
Feb. 20
The Post and Courier of Charleston on state officials asking an investigation be opened into emails supporting two energy utilities’ merger:
A lot of South Carolina residents have very strong opinions about the proposed merger between SCANA and Virginia-based Dominion Energy. At least a few of them have opinions they’re not even aware of.
Some state lawmakers reported recently receiving form emails supporting the merger and bearing the names and addresses of real South Carolina residents. But not all of those people sent the emails - or even approve of the Dominion deal, according to a Post and Courier report on Monday.
So far, it’s not clear who sent the fraudulent emails, but the form letter was written by the Consumer Energy Alliance, an industry group whose members include Dominion and, at least at one point, SCANA. It’s not the first time the Consumer Energy Alliance has been caught up in similar episodes, but the group’s president David Holt has denied his organization sent the emails.
On Monday, the state Attorney General’s office, with the backing of several lawmakers, asked the State Law Enforcement Division to open a formal investigation into the matter. That’s the appropriate response.
The SCANA-Dominion merger would be a really big deal for many South Carolinians. Families would get on average a $1,000 cash rebate and pay slightly lower electric bills, but customers would still individually owe about $5,000 over the next two decades to pay for two nuclear reactors that will never generate power.
It’s possible that even that flawed deal would be better than the worst-case alternative - rate cuts forcing SCANA into bankruptcy, disrupting the state’s business climate and eventually driving rates even higher for customers.
But it’s hardly clear that’s the case. Multiple ongoing investigations must still be completed before making any big decisions.
In the meantime, it’s critical that South Carolina residents get accurate, timely information about the Dominion deal and other alternatives. Lawmakers complained last week that they had fielded calls from constituents referencing the $1,000 rebate hyped in a statewide Dominion advertising blitz even though they don’t have any SCANA electric customers in their districts, for example.
Likewise, lawmakers need a realistic idea of what their constituents want. It is unconscionable, if not illegal, to mislead legislators by falsifying emails from real South Carolina residents. And the state’s leaders shouldn’t have to wonder if every communication with a constituent is legitimate.
SLED must get to the bottom of the situation as soon as possible.
The fallout from SCANA and project partner Santee Cooper’s failed nuclear aspirations is one of South Carolina’s biggest economic challenges ever. Residents deserve to know that negotiations are happening in good faith, that they are being heard by their elected representatives - and that their voices are their own.
Online: https://www.postandcourier.com/
___
Feb. 21
The Times and Democrat of Orangeburg on a study saying the number of identity fraud victims has increased:
Once upon a time, stealing a person’s identity would have seemed farfetched. The stuff of movies. Now it appears to be easy.
And the problem is growing.
The 2018 Identity Fraud Study released in February by Javelin Strategy & Research revealed that the number of identity fraud victims increased by 8 percent (rising to 16.7 million U.S. consumers) in the last year, a record high since the firm began tracking identity fraud in 2003.
The study found that despite industry efforts to prevent identity fraud, fraudsters successfully adapted to net 1.3 million more victims in 2017, with the amount stolen rising to $16.8 billion. With the adoption of EMV (embedded chip) cards and terminals, the types of identity fraud continued to shift online and away from physical stores.
The complexity of fraud is also on the rise as criminals are opening more new accounts as a means of compromising accounts consumers already have.
This last year saw a notable change in how fraud is being committed. While credit card accounts remained the most prevalent targets for new account fraud, there was significant growth in the opening of new intermediary accounts, such as email payments (e.g. PayPal) and other internet accounts (e.g. e-commerce merchants such as Amazon) by fraudsters. Although not as easily monetized alone, these account types are invaluable in helping fraudsters transfer funds from the existing accounts of their victims.
The study also found three significant changes in data breaches in 2017.
. Nearly a third (30 percent) of U.S. consumers were notified of a breach in the past year, up from 12 percent in 2016.
. For the first time ever, Social Security numbers (35 percent) were compromised more than credit card numbers (30 percent) in breaches.
. Finally, data breaches are causing consumers to lose trust in institutions. These trends combined to cause consumers to shift the perceived responsibility for preventing fraud from themselves to other entities, such as their financial institution or the companies storing their data.
“2017 was a runaway year for fraudsters, and with the amount of valid information they have on consumers, their attacks are just getting more complex,” said Al Pascual, senior vice president, research director and head of fraud and security, Javelin Strategy & Research. “Fraudsters are growing more sophisticated in response to industry’s efforts to implement better security. Fortunately, there are a variety of digital tools that consumers can leverage to stay better informed on the status of their identities and accounts, and to ultimately stay better protected.”
The 2018 Identity Fraud Study found four significant trends:
. Record high incidence of identity fraud - In 2017, 6.64 percent of consumers became victims of identity fraud, an increase of almost a million victims from the previous year. This increase was driven by growth in both existing non-card fraud and account takeover.
. Account takeover grew significantly - Account takeover tripled over the past year, reaching a four-year high. Total ATO losses reached $5.1 billion, a 120 percent increase from 2016. Account takeover continues to be one of the most challenging fraud types for consumers with victims paying an average of $290 in out-of-pocket costs and spending 16 hours on average to resolve. This translates to more than 62.2 million hours of time consumers lost in 2017. That is enough time for more than 3 million people to binge watch the first and second season of Stranger Things.
. Online shopping presents the greatest fraud opportunity - EMV is driving more fraudsters to seek online channels for fraud. Card Not Present Fraud is now 81 percent more likely than point of sale fraud, the greatest gap Javelin has observed.
. Fraudsters are getting more sophisticated - Fraudsters are getting more sophisticated in their attacks, and using more complex and difficult to detect monetization schemes. One and a half million victims of existing account fraud had an intermediary account opened in their name first. This is 200 percent greater than the previous high.
And all this worry about identity theft and its potentially devastating impact on a person’s life is having an effect.
New this year, the 2018 Identity Fraud Study examined the impact the relentless news about data breaches is having on consumers. With rising fraud incidence and extensive media coverage of the Equifax breach, the proportion of consumers who are concerned about fraud rose from 51 percent in 2016 to 69 percent in 2017. Breaches rank at the top of identity-related threats facing consumers according to those surveyed.
But the finding that is most revealing and should come as no surprise is the feeling of helplessness that most people have.
Javelin found 63 percent of consumers report that they are “very” or “extremely” concerned about the threat of breaches, but many are unsure that they have the ability to effectively protect themselves. Cynicism about breach notifications rose dramatically, with 64 percent of breach victims indicating they believe that breach notifications do little to help protect them and are principally about providing legal cover for the breached company.
All of this combined caused consumers to shift the perceived responsibility for preventing fraud from themselves to other entities, such as companies storing their data.
Some things don’t change. Looking for someone to blame for an intractable problem remains as much a part of human nature in the computer age as ever.
Online: http://thetandd.com
Please read our comment policy before commenting.