- Associated Press - Thursday, November 3, 2016

CHARLESTON, S.C. (AP) - A man riding with a motorist who was fatally shot by a police officer while running away from a traffic stop testified Thursday that he doesn’t know why his friend tried to flee.

“That’s a question I would like to ask him. Unfortunately, I can’t. He was murdered,” said Pierre Fulton, who worked with Walter Scott at a distribution warehouse and was riding in the front passenger seat when Michael Slager, a North Charleston police officer, pulled them over for a broken taillight.

A bystander’s cellphone recording of Scott’s death stunned the nation as the images spread on social media. Slager, who is white, faces 30 years to life if convicted of murder in the shooting of Scott, who was black. He also faces separate federal charges including violations of Scott’s civil rights.

Fulton said Scott surrendered his driver’s license and stepped out of the car. Slager then ordered Scott to get back in again, and he complied. Then, as the officer was checking the information, Scott bolted.

“The next thing you know, he was out the door,” Fulton said.

The gunshots rang out a short time later, he said.

While sitting in the car, Scott called his mother on his cellphone.

“He didn’t sound very good. He sounded in distress,” Jury Scott, 73, told the jury as she fought back tears.

“He said, ’They were tasing me.’ I heard him groaning like he was in excruciating pain several times,” she said. “I told him, ’You know North Charleston policemen, so just do whatever they say.’”

Solicitor Scarlett Wilson said Slager fired eight times after failing to subdue Scott with a stun gun; five of the shots hit Scott in the back and buttocks.

The bystander’s video showed Scott, 50, being felled from a distance. It did not capture the entirety of the encounter; nor did the dash cam video from Slager’s cruiser, which recorded only the traffic stop itself.

Jurors watched that dash cam video in court Thursday. It shows Scott suddenly running from his car and out of view after Slager goes to his cruiser to check the license.

North Charleston Police Sgt. Scott Hille, called by the prosecution to introduce the police video, was asked by the defense if it showed anything unprofessional in Slager’s behavior in handling the stop.

Hille replied: “Not that I can think of, sir.”

Scott’s family members and friends were the first to take the stand. His fiancee, Charlotte Jones, called him a “loving and kind person.” Neighbor Arthur Heyward, who had just sold Scott the car, called him “a good friend and neighbor. We looked out for each other.”

Wilson told the jury of 11 whites and one black in her opening statement that even if Scott wrestled with Slager over the stun gun, that provocation did not justify being shot to death.

“If Walter Scott had not resisted arrest, he wouldn’t have been shot. He paid the extreme consequence for his conduct. He lost his life for his foolishness,” she acknowledged.

But she said Slager must be held accountable for “his decision to go too far - his decision to let his sense of authority get the better of him.”

Defense attorney Andy Savage countered that Slager “earned a reputation of excellence” in his five years with the North Charleston police, and he sought to pin responsibility on Scott.

“Why did he choose not to respect the request to stay where he was? That’s something that I hope you consider,” Savage told the jurors. “It wasn’t Mr. Slager who was angry and full of animosity.”

The family has said Scott may have tried to flee because he was worried about having to go back to jail for missing child support payments. Savage called that “pure speculation,” and said there was no way Slager could have known Scott was unarmed.

“He never had a chance to pat him down. He never had a chance to frisk him,” he said.

An attorney for the Scott family, Chris Stewart, told reporters after the court adjourned following a full day of statements and testimony that the family is not concerned a nearly all-white jury is hearing the case.

“All you need in this case is everything all juries have: two eyes and a brain. It doesn’t matter what color they are, because they have eyes that can see that videotape,” he said.

___

Kinnard reported from Columbia and can be reached at https://twitter.com/MegKinnardAP . Read more of her work at https://bigstory.ap.org/content/meg-kinnard/ .

Copyright © 2024 The Washington Times, LLC.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide