OPINION:
“Genocide” is an ugly word, describing the systemic annihilation of an ethnic, cultural or national group. It shouldn’t be used carelessly. Nonetheless, men and women of conscience, including Pope Francis, have applied it to the Islamic State’s slaughter of Christians in the Middle East. Conspicuous by his absence is President Obama, whose ears are apparently not attuned to the cries of pity from the followers of the Cross. Christians deserve better from a Nobel Peace Prize medalist.
The president urged those at the National Prayer Breakfast last week to remember the plight of persecuted Christians. “We pray for God’s protection for all around the world who are not free to practice their faith, including Christians who are persecuted, or who have been driven from their ancient homelands by unspeakable violence.” The founder of the faith that bears His name never instructed his followers, among whom Mr. Obama counts himself, to be fearful and passive in the presence of evil.
Nevertheless, White House spokesman Josh Earnest explained after the breakfast coffee cups were cleared that the president is reluctant to apply the word “genocide” because of “legal ramifications … There are lawyers considering whether or not that term can be properly applied in this scenario.” In this litigious era, the use of the G-word could trigger an ISIS lawsuit for defamation of character. (Nobody could make this stuff up.)
But Barack Obama leads from behind, or not at all. Pope Francis no doubt has lawyers, too, but he has endorsed putting the label on ISIS, and so have the Holy See’s representative to the United Nations in Geneva, the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom and 30 members of Congress. The European Parliament, rarely a bold voice for righteousness, adopted a resolution recognizing that the “so-called’ISIS/Daesh’ commits genocide against Christians and Yazidis and other religious and ethnic minorities.” The U.S. State Department is said to be considering a genocide designation for the massacre of the Yazidis, but not Christians.
In its quest for a caliphate to overspread the entire Middle East, ISIS is systematically driving out or killing all those whose religious practices do not mirror their own, including other Muslims. Christians comprise only 3 percent of Iraqis and 8 percent of Syrians, and those numbers are dwindling rapidly. ISIS offers men and women of other faiths — if, indeed, radical Islam can accurately be called a “faith” — who fall into their hands dreadful choices: Convert to Islam, pay a heavy tax or, if a man, expect a grisly death. Women and children are favored with rape and enslavement. Many choose to flee, seeking safety amid the millions who crowd refugee camps in Jordan and Turkey, or risk taking the long journey to Europe, where they are usually less than warmly welcomed.
Moral weakness is the source of reluctance to face up to evil. Mr. Obama and the State Department repeat a toothless solution to the ISIS-inspired Syrian civil war: “We continue to believe that that has to be solved through political solutions, through political dialogue, through getting the parties together and working through this transition.” Tough stuff like that ought to put the fear of Allah into them.
Please read our comment policy before commenting.