OPINION:
The 2015-16 presidential campaign has turned into a bitter battle between two mighty forces fighting over what qualifications are needed to get control of a hopelessly dysfunctional government.
On one side, an anti-establishment insurgency believes an outsider with no previous experience in elective office can achieve such a monumental task.
On the other side is the establishment, mostly governors with a track record for reform and moving an aggressive agenda for change through the political process.
That battle is now being fought out in the GOP by anti-establishment candidates like billionaire Donald Trump and acclaimed former surgeon Ben Carson, front-runners in the race for their party’s presidential nomination.
Mr. Trump is polling 33 percent support among registered Republicans, according to the latest CNN survey. Dr. Carson polls 20 percent. Everyone else is well behind in single digits.
But whether any of them succeed remains to be seen because nearly two-thirds of voters think Mr. Trump and Dr. Carson are not qualified for the job.
Last week a Washington Post-ABC News poll asked voters around the country this question: “Regardless of whether or not you’d vote for him, do you think Donald Trump is or is not qualified to serve as president?
Sixty percent of all the voters polled said he was not qualified, 37 percent said he was, and 2 percent had no opinion.
Seventy-eight percent of Democrats said he wasn’t qualified, but 20 percent of them said he was.
Among independents, 61 percent said he wasn’t qualified, 37 percent said he was.
Among Republicans, 64 percent said he was qualified, but 35 percent said he was not.
The polling numbers also reveal just how much voters deeply distrust establishment politicians.
More than 7 in 10 voters believe that people in government can’t be trusted, and 6 in 10 say the entire political system is broken.
Meantime, Hillary Clinton, the Democratic presidential front-runner, has bigger problems. Her numbers are falling sharply, particularly in her own party.
In July, a Post-ABC News poll found that a 71 percent of Democratic-leaning women voters said they intended to vote for the former secretary of state.
That number has since plunged to 42 percent, falling 29 points in just eight weeks.
Notably, Mrs. Clinton drew significantly higher support from nonwhite Democratic-leaning women, 60 percent of whom supported her. But only 37 percent of white Democratic women say they support her now.
Clearly, the email scandal that has led to an FBI probe, congressional investigations and an abject apology for what she calls a “mistake” in judgment, has severely hurt her candidacy.
The findings in this week’s Washington Post-ABC News poll gives us other clues about what the voters think of Mrs. Clinton at this juncture.
Reading brief statements, pollsters asked voters to “tell me whether this applies to Hillary Clinton.”
“Is honest and trustworthy”: 56 percent said no and 39 percent yes.
“Understands the problems of people like you”: 51 percent said no and 46 percent yes.
“Has the kind of personality and temperament it takes to serve effectively as president”: 41 percent said no, 56 percent yes.
But Mr. Trump doesn’t do well on these descriptions, either.
“Honest and trustworthy”: 59 percent say no, and 35 percent say yes.
“Understands the problems of people like you”: 67 percent say no and 29 percent say yes.
“Has the kind of personality and temperament it takes to serve effectively as president”: 63 percent say no and 33 percent say yes.
But when pollsters asked registered voters “who would you vote for” if the election were held today, the response is underwhelming.
Forty-six percent said Mrs. Clinton, 43 percent said Mr. Trump. and 12 percent said someone else or had no opinion.
It’s a long time from now to Election Day and there will likely be several major blockbuster revelations before this campaign is over.
The Club for Growth, which gives money to tax-cutting, pro-growth Republican candidates who are challenging liberal GOP incumbents, is running ads against Mr. Trump. David McIntosh, president of the group, says the ads show Mr. Trump is “liberal on taxes, trade, health care and eminent domain.”
In past years, Mr. Trump has embraced liberal policies, and has contributed money to Hillary’s earlier campaigns. “These ads let Trump speak for himself,” Mr. McIntosh said.
This week, the computer firm that managed and handled Mrs. Clinton’s secret email server revealed that it had not been “wiped” clean and her emails could be recovered.
When the story first broke that she had been mingling her official State Department and personal emails on her own private computer, Mrs. Clinton said she had deleted all of her messages that she deemed personal — 31,000 emails in all. That led investigators to believe that they were erased and gone forever.
But Platte River Networks, a Denver-based company that has managed her private system, told The Washington Post it’s now possible that all the emails may be retrieved.
“All the information we have is that the server wasn’t wiped,” said a spokesman.
What is still stored on the computer system? Will there be many more classified emails to come that will contradict her repeated denials of any wrongdoing?
Stay tuned.
• Donald Lambro is a syndicated columnist and contributor to The Washington Times.
Please read our comment policy before commenting.