FLORENCE, Italy (AP) - Few international criminal cases have stirred national passions as strongly as that of American student Amanda Knox, waiting half a world away for her third Italian court verdict in the 2007 slaying of her British roommate, 21-year-old Meredith Kercher.
Whatever is decided this week, the protracted legal battle that has grabbed global headlines and polarized trial-watchers in three nations probably won’t end in Florence.
The first two trials produced flip-flop verdicts of guilty then innocent for Knox and her former Italian boyfriend, Raffaele Sollecito, and the case has produced harshly clashing versions of events. A Florence appeals panel designated by Italy’s supreme court to address issues it raised about the acquittal is set to deliberate Thursday, with a verdict expected later in the day.
Much of the attention has focused on Knox, 26, who has remained in Seattle during this trial, citing her fear of “the universal problem of wrongful conviction,” according to her statement emailed to the Florence court. Her representatives say she is concentrating on her studies at the University of Washington.
“We wait for the verdict, and remain hopeful,” Knox’s U.S. lawyer, Theodore Simon, said by telephone from Philadelphia. “But history being our guide, we know Amanda can be convicted and it is very disconcerting to her and her family. The logical position is that there is no evidence.”
Knox was arrested four days after Kercher’s half-naked body was discovered Nov. 2, 2007 in the Briton’s bedroom in the university town of Perugia. Knox has been portrayed both as a she-devil bent on sexual adventure and as a naif caught up in Italy’s Byzantine justice system.
U.S. commentators have accused the Italian judicial system of a case of misapplied justice and double jeopardy, while Italians and British observers have jumped on the image encoded in the U.S. defendant’s pre-trial moniker, “foxy Knoxy.”
“I don’t remember any case which has been as highly publicized and where the countries have taken sides,” noted defense attorney Alan Dershowitz, who has written about the case.
“I think it’s fair to say that the vast number of Americans think she is innocent and a substantial number of Italians think she is guilty,” he said in a telephone interview.
The courts have cast wildly different versions of events. Knox and Sollecito were convicted of murder and sexual assault in the first trial based on DNA evidence, confused alibis and Knox’s false accusation against a Congolese bar owner, for which she was also convicted of slander.
Then an appeals court in Perugia dismantled the murder verdicts, criticizing the “building blocks” of the conviction, including DNA evidence deemed unreliable by new experts, and lack of motive.
That acquittal was scathingly vacated last spring by Italy’s highest court, which ordered a new appeals trial to examine evidence and hear testimony it said had been improperly omitted by the Perugia appeals court, and to redress what it identified as lapses in logic.
In this trial, Judge Alessandro Nencini ordered an analysis of a tiny trace of DNA on the presumed murder weapon, a knife found in Sollecito’s kitchen. In the first trial, DNA traces on the blade linked to Kercher and one on the handle linked to Knox were key to the conviction. But the appeals court trial placed the DNA findings in doubt.
The new trace tested in Florence belonged to Knox and not to the victim. The defense argued that this was further proof that Knox had merely used the kitchen knife for domestic chores in Sollecito’s apartment. The prosecution, which has continued to argue the validity of Kercher’s DNA trace on the blade from the original trial, said the additional trace once again put the knife in Knox’s hands.
The real novelty of the Florence hearings was that the new prosecutor, Alessandro Crini, redefined the motive, moving away from the drug-fueled erotic game described by his colleagues in Perugia. He contended that the outburst of violence was rooted in arguments between roommates Knox and Kercher about cleanliness and triggered by a toilet left unflushed by Rudy Hermann Guede, the only person now in jail for the murder.
Crini has demanded sentences of 26 years on the murder charge for Knox and Sollecito.
A guilty verdict would need to be confirmed by Italy’s supreme court, which could take a year or more and, in theory, result in yet another appeals court trial.
For Sollecito, a guilty verdict could mean immediate arrest, house arrest or passport seizure. One of his lawyers, Luca Maori, said that Sollecito will come to court on Thursday.
For Knox, the situation is more complicated.
Legal experts agree that it is unlikely that Italy would seek extradition until there is a final verdict. Still, Markus Wiget, trial lawyer in Milan with expertise in extraditions, said Italy could - but probably would not - seek immediate extradition on grounds of urgency, which could include the risk a defendant would disappear.
Dershowitz believes double jeopardy would not be an issue because Knox’s acquittal was not a final judgment. He also doubts that the United States would want to set a precedent by refusing to extradite her if she is convicted, given that the United States makes frequent extradition requests for defendants sought by U.S. courts.
“The easiest thing for the court to do is acquit. It probably ends it there. If it is a conviction, it is just the beginning of what would be a very lengthy and difficult process,” Dershowitz said.
Kercher’s family, which has a legal team aiding the prosecution, remains persuaded that Knox and Sollecito were responsible for Kercher’s death along with Guede, an Ivory Coast native and small-time drug dealer, who is serving a 16-year sentence. Kercher’s sister Stephanie and one brother, Lyle, are planning to attend the verdict, said Francesco Maresca, one of the family’s lawyers.
“This trial is a tragedy for everyone,” said Vieri Fabiani, one of the lawyers representing Kercher’s family. “For these kids, for the poor girl who isn’t here anymore. And for those who went beyond what could have been their intent.”
Please read our comment policy before commenting.