OPINION:
An election-minded Congress defused the Social Security payroll-tax cut issue last week, but a much more politically lethal time bomb is set to go off at the end of the year.
That’s when the tax cuts signed by President George W. Bush will expire, shoving taxpayers into higher tax brackets that could drive an anemic economy back into a recession.
Income tax rates will go up, including the 10 percent tax rate on the first $8,700 of income, which will climb to 15 percent, hurting the poorest Americans and the middle class hardest of all. The $1,000 child tax credit will drop back to $500 per child, increasing the cost of raising a family.
The pro-growth 15 percent investment tax on dividends and capital gains from equities that millions of older people depend upon in their retirement years will rise to at least 20 percent. That will squeeze investment in the economy and weaken tax revenue flow, which will worsen the deficit.
The top income tax rates will rise, too, with the highest tax rate shooting up from 35 percent to nearly 39 percent, punishing small businesses that file as individual taxpayers.
The “marriage penalty” for joint filing couples also will go up, hitting married working couples with higher taxes than they would pay if they were single.
Throw in the Jan. 1 restoration of the 6.2 percent payroll tax, up from 4.2 percent under the recently extended reduction, and you’ve got the perfect meltdown scenario that will flatten incomes, cut jobs and slow down the Obama economy to less than 1 percent.
Republicans want to avoid this by making the Bush tax cuts permanent. The economy, after all, has been showing some signs of growth, lackluster though they are - growth that has occurred due to the Bush tax cuts, despite President Obama’s belief that they have hurt the economy.
Mr. Obama wants to keep the former president’s middle-class tax cuts, but significantly raise taxes on investors, corporations and higher-income working couples earning more than $250,000. However, that’s not going to happen as long as Republicans control the House, where all tax revenue bills must originate.
This raises fears of a post-election stalemate in a lame-duck Congress that would let the tax cuts expire in 2013 when the unemployment rate is expected to still be above 8 percent.
There are those who continue to believe a deal will be made in the 11th hour before this Congress ends. “I see the framework of a big agreement in the lame-duck [session] to finally put this divisiveness behind us,” Rep. Richard E. Neal, Massachusetts Democrat and senior member of the tax-writing Ways and Means Committee, told The Washington Post last week. “Obama’s going to have great leverage to get something done.”
Yeah, like after the 2010 election, when his party got a shellacking in Congress, the economy showed no signs of improvement, and he reluctantly agreed to a two-year extension of the Bush tax cuts.
No one can predict what will happen in November, but the likely parameters of the election are beginning to come into sharper focus.
Despite polls showing Congress’ approval rating has sunk to a record low of 10 percent, surveys also show a strong majority of voters approve of their representative and senators.
With the House firmly in the grip of the Republicans, by 242 to 192 with one vacancy, it appears highly unlikely the GOP will lose control in November.
The Democrats’ 53-47 Senate majority is much more tenuous. Republicans need three more seats to effectively take control if they win the White House, with the vice president breaking tie votes. But if Mr. Obama wins a second term, the GOP would need just four more seats that forecasters say is easily within their reach.
“With five Democratic seats at greatest risk - Nebraska, North Dakota, Missouri, Montana, Virginia - and another five - New Mexico, Ohio, Florida, Wisconsin, Hawaii - the 2012 Senate landscape is stacked in the Republicans’ favor,” says Stuart Rothenberg in his latest race-by-race analysis.
This means that Republicans would be in control of Congress, and if Mr. Obama were to win a second term - which very much depends on who the GOP nominee is - he can kiss any tax increases goodbye.
In that situation, with the Republicans ruling Capitol Hill, he likely will be sent legislation in January to make the tax cuts permanent with additional tax reforms to boost growth and new job creation. The political pressure on him would be intense to sign the bill to get the economy going again.
But what if he loses the election and refuses to extend the Bush tax cuts in a bitter battle with a divided lame-duck Congress, allowing them to expire? That seems unlikely because he would be hurting the very segment of the electorate he says he most wants to protect - the middle class.
But in that situation, even if he held his ground and let the tax cuts die, it would be a futile act of political retribution that would gain him nothing but public enmity.
A Republican majority would send legislation to the new president soon after the new Congress is sworn in and restore the tax cuts retroactively with every assurance it would be immediately signed into law.
The political argument that Mr. Obama’s failed policies have allowed this high unemployment and painfully slow recovery to go on much longer than it needed to is a powerful one.
The Christian Science Monitor said the “standard of living for Americans has fallen longer and more steeply over the past three years than at any time since the U.S. government began recording it five decades ago.”
The Obama economy is in the fourth year of a high unemployment economy, with nothing to show for it except more poverty, record bankruptcies, mounting foreclosures and more than $5 trillion in additional debt on the backs of generations to come.
Donald Lambro is a syndicated columnist and former chief political correspondent for The Washington Times.
Please read our comment policy before commenting.