Mitt Romney takes a hard line against congressional earmarks, but the GOP presidential front-runner had a more favorable view of federal pork-barrel spending when he was governor of Massachusetts.
Under his leadership, Massachusetts sought tens of millions of dollars in earmarks for transportation projects through the state’s congressional delegation.
A prime example was the $30 million that the Romney administration requested to renovate the historic Longfellow Bridge that spans the Charles River between Cambridge and Boston. The landmark is seen in many movies and television shows.
Mr. Romney’s transportation secretary, Daniel A. Grabauskas, asked the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee to include the money in a transportation-spending bill. That bill was full of thousands of earmarks that sparked public furor and became a symbol for Washington’s out-of-control spending when Congress passed it in 2005.
In a letter June 17, 2004, to the transportation panel’s chief of staff that was obtained by the Associated Press, Mr. Grabauskas said federal money for the Longfellow Bridge could be provided as part of the “bridge program, a new mega-project or an outside earmark, or a combination of the three.” Mr. Grabauskas did not immediately respond to phone messages from AP seeking comment.
A Romney campaign spokeswoman would not respond to questions about how many earmarks the Romney administration asked for, the amount of money involved and the particular projects.
“Every state budget in the country is dependent on federal funding, and every governor in the country makes requests for funding, but governors do not get to decide how Congress appropriates money,” said Andrea Saul, a Romney spokeswoman. “Gov. Romney supports a permanent ban on earmarks, which are symbols of what’s wrong with Washington.”
When Mr. Romney was governor and his state was desperately seeking federal dollars to repair crumbling roads and bridges, his administration suggested earmarks for projects to lawmakers on Capitol Hill who were in a position to request the money.
Romney officials specified projects they wanted included as earmarks in the transportation bill to members of the Massachusetts congressional delegation as the measure moved through Congress, said Rep. James P. McGovern, Massachusetts Democrat.
“The Romney administration was crystal clear on earmarks and what they wanted,” Mr. McGovern said. “They sent us a letter specifically asking for money to be earmarked for projects.”
Rep. Michael E. Capuano, Massachusetts Democrat, said he was also approached by Romney officials asking for earmarks.
“It was a routine thing,” Mr. Capuano said. “They went to different members in the delegation. They came to me and said, ’Here’s what we need.’ They didn’t do a ton of [asking for earmarks], but they did enough of it.”
During his campaign, Mr. Romney and his allies have hammered rivals Newt Gingrich, a former House speaker, and Rick Santorum, a former representative and senator from Pennsylvania, as “prolific earmarkers” winning federal money, and he has called for a permanent ban on earmarks.
Earmarking is the longtime Washington practice in which lawmakers insert money for home-state projects like road and bridge work into spending bills.
Please read our comment policy before commenting.