Tuesday, May 10, 2011

The prevailing news is on the subject of whether photographs of the slain Osama bin Laden should be released (“Without photo proof, is bin Laden really dead?” Page 1, Thursday). President Obama and the majority of his security advisers seem, at least for the present, to have come down on the side of not releasing these images for the world to see. Arguments can be made for both sides in this debate.

In the final analysis, however, fear of retribution by Islamists should not be the criterion for this decision. Fear is never a strong position from which a nation devoted to openness and bravery reaches such decisions, and America is such a nation. On the other hand, neither should these photographs be released to quell some theory that bin Laden is still alive, or to brag about the fact of our success in bringing down the No. 1 terrorist leader.

These photographs should be released because we are an open society with the full right to see these images. America has outstanding values, and these values include the right to access important information that does not have a critical impact on national security. The president’s decision seems much more crafted to pacify the Muslim world and to avoid fearful consequences than to serve the cause of freedom and American values.

The release of the pictures should not be seen as “spiking the ball” in the end zone of public opinion, but rather freedom of expression and the inherent right of all Americans and the world to experience something historic and important in our lives.

BOB JACK

Las Vegas

Copyright © 2024 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide