ISLAMABAD, Pakistan (AP) — The Pakistani army denied Wednesday that one of its majors was among a group of Pakistanis who Western officials say were arrested for feeding the CIA information before the American raid that killed Osama bin Laden.
The New York Times, which first reported the arrests of five Pakistani informants Tuesday, said an army major who copied license plates of cars visiting the al Qaeda chief’s compound in Pakistan in the weeks before the raid had been detained.
A Western official in Pakistan confirmed that five Pakistanis who fed information to the CIA before the May 2 operation were arrested by Pakistan’s top intelligence service.
But Maj. Gen. Athar Abbas, a Pakistani army spokesman, denied an army major was arrested, saying the report was “false and totally baseless.” Neither the army nor Pakistan’s spy agency would confirm or deny the overall report about the detentions.
The group of detained Pakistanis included the owner of a safe house rented to the CIA to observe bin Laden’s compound in Abbottabad, an army town not far from the Pakistani capital of Islamabad, a U.S. official said. The owner was detained along with a “handful” of other Pakistanis, said the official.
The Western officials spoke on condition of anonymity because of sensitive intelligence matters.
The fate of the purported CIA informants who were arrested was unclear, but American officials told the New York Times that CIA Director Leon E. Panetta raised the issue when he visited Islamabad last week to meet with Pakistani military and intelligence officers.
U.S.-Pakistani relations have been strained over the raid by Navy SEALs on Pakistani territory, which embarrassed Pakistan’s military, and other issues.
One of the issues that has caused tension between the two countries is U.S. drone missile strikes targeting militants in Pakistan’s tribal region near the Afghan border.
A pair of attacks targeted a suspected militant compound and a vehicle in the South Waziristan tribal area on Wednesday, killing at least 10 alleged insurgents, according to Pakistani intelligence officials. The officials, speaking on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to talk to the media, said the vehicle that was hit turned out to be empty.
Pakistani officials often denounce the strikes in public, even though many are believed to support them in private. But that support has been strained in the wake of the bin Laden raid, especially since the strikes are very unpopular with the Pakistani public.
Officials said the arrests of the suspected informants was just the latest evidence of the fractured relationship between the two nations.
The New York Times said that, at a closed briefing last week, members of the Senate Intelligence Committee asked Michael Morell, the deputy CIA director, to rate Pakistan’s cooperation with the United States on counterterrorism operations on a scale of 1 to 10.
“Three,” Mr. Morell replied, according to officials familiar with the exchange, the newspaper said.
American officials speaking to the newspaper cautioned that Mr. Morell’s comment was a snapshot of the current relationship and did not represent the Obama administration’s overall assessment.
“We have a strong relationship with our Pakistani counterparts and work through issues when they arise,” Marie Harf, a CIA spokeswoman, told the newspaper. “Director Panetta had productive meetings last week in Islamabad. It’s a crucial partnership, and we will continue to work together in the fight against al Qaeda and other terrorist groups who threaten our country and theirs.”
Husain Haqqani, Pakistan’s ambassador to the United States, said in an interview with the New York Times that the CIA and the Pakistani spy agency “are working out mutually acceptable terms for their cooperation in fighting the menace of terrorism. It is not appropriate for us to get into the details at this stage.”
Kimberly Dozier reported from Washington. Associated Press writers Kathy Gannon in Kabul, Afghanistan, and Ishtiaq Mahsud in Dera Ismail Khan, Pakistan, contributed to this report.
Please read our comment policy before commenting.