- The Washington Times - Wednesday, July 27, 2011

JANE’S LAMENT

Alas, poor Jane. When home shopping network QVC canceled a July 16 appearance to promote “Primetime,” her new book on aging, Jane Fonda took to her blog, complaining that the broadcaster had capitulated to “well funded and organized political extremist groups” still unhappy with her 1972 visit to North Vietnam.

Miss Fonda, 73, then posted a 4,200-word entry titled, “The Truth About My Trip to Hanoi,” addressing her role as a “traitor,” media spin and emphasizing, “my anger back then was at the Nixon administration.” She later added a blog entry about “forgiveness.” But the actress still hasn’t been asked back to QVC.

“Jane Fonda has lived to be old enough to be allowed a sneak peek at her legacy and she apparently doesn’t like what she’s seeing,” says BigHollywood.com correspondent John Nolte. “Unfortunately for Fonda, when it comes to most things, we Americans really are a forgiving bunch. Especially in the arenas of personal, sexual and bad boyish behavior.”

Mr. Nolte continues, “Something we’re not as forgiving about, however, is the betrayal of our country or the appeasing of an enemy. Fair or not, this is something that will forever haunt the legacies of Joe Kennedy Sr. and Charles Lindbergh. And so it will with Jane Fonda.”

FUNCTIONAL DYSFUNCTION

White House “scare tactics” about the debt-ceiling deadline are stale. The public did not dutifully buy into President Obama’s suggestions that the stalemate could yield disaster. So talking points changed. The blame game was reinstated with a psychobabble twist: The White House word of choice to be weaponized is now “dysfunctional,” launched during Mr. Obama’s speech Monday night when he intoned that the American people “didn’t vote for a dysfunctional government.”

Bingo. The obliging press embraced the narrative. In 72 hours, much is “dysfunctional,” from Congress, to Republicans to the debate itself — repeated in a fierce feedback loop. How often? Try 1,300 mentions for “dysfunctional Congress,” another 1,300 for “dysfunctional Republicans” and 654 for “dysfunctional politics” in recent news stories, this according to an informal Google News count.

W SPEAKS

He chose the National Geographic Channel to speak about the unspeakable: Former President George W. Bush shares his first ever personal account of 9/11 as the nation faces the 10-year anniversary of the terror attacks, and the inevitable welter of news stories and TV specials. Such coverage may devolve into partisan high jinks, a showcase for the blame-America crowd or mawkish hand-wringing. Or maybe not.

“There were no politics, no agenda as he recalled what happened that day,” says Peter Schnall, executive producer of Partisan Pictures — the company behind the film — and the man who conducted the two-day interview with Mr. Bush.

“What you hear is the personal story of a man who also happened to be our president. Listening to him describe how he grappled with a sense of anger and frustration coupled with his personal mandate to lead our country through this devastating attack was incredibly powerful,” Mr. Schnall observes.

“It was like walking into hell,” Mr. Bush says in film, of his visit to still smoking ground zero. The documentary premieres Aug. 28.

COLLOIDAL MOMENT

“His Jello-Ness, the president. In the debate over our debt, President Obama has stood for nothing and fallen for anything politically convenient.”

(The Republican National Committee, after reviewing the latest machinations of the debt-ceiling crisis.)

A READ ON REID

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s proposal that the U.S. can save $1 trillion through defense cutbacks is “fictional,” says Gordon Adams, a foreign policy professor at American University.

“A trillion in ’savings’ from phasing out the wars over the next decade is not real. These are calculated from a Congressional Budget Office baseline of war funding that extrapolates the fiscal year 2011 war appropriation of $159 billion through the next decade, growing it with inflation,” Mr. Adams says. “The administration has used an equally unreal number for war costs — $50 billion a year starting next year over the next 10 years, in no way driven by policy or program.”

The professor adds, “This is the worst kind of phony budgeting and phony savings. It will do little to deal with the deficit, it is just a numbers game. It is budget-cutting on the cheap that in no way deals with the underlying growth and need for discipline in defense spending.”

A FIELD REPORT

“On Tuesday, MoveOn held a small rally in front of Republican Rep. Don Manzullo’s local office in Rockford, Ill. I am in the Northern Illinois Tea Party. We joined with the Rockford Tea Party group and held a counter-rally across the driveway from them. About 40 people in all were there, evenly split. I was helping hold up a yellow Gadsden flag,” reports Washington Times reader Bob Sumner, who says his information is anecdotal.

“A middle-aged guy near me said that he had gone over to the other group and they were signing some demonstrators in and out so they could be paid,” Mr. Sumner says. “One of our guys talked to one of their young demonstrators who said he was an ex-con and couldn’t get a job.”

POLL DU JOUR

• 68 percent of Americans say lawmakers should be “willing to compromise” on the debt-ceiling debate.

• 53 percent of Republicans, 42 percent of tea party supporters and 81 percent of Democrats agree.

• 23 percent overall say lawmakers should “stand by their principles,” even if the government goes into default.

• 38 percent of Republicans, 53 percent of tea partyers and 12 percent of Democrats agree.

• 65 percent of Americans overall agree that if Congress does not meet the Aug. 2 deadline it will affect their finances.

• 56 percent overall say President Obama and lawmakers will resolve the debt-ceiling issue before Aug. 2.

Source: A Pew Research Center poll of 1,501 adults conducted July 20 to 24.

Yeas, yays, neighs and nays to jharper@washingtontimes.com.

• Jennifer Harper can be reached at jharper@washingtontimes.com.

Copyright © 2024 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide