WASHINGTON (AP) — Former Agriculture Department official Shirley Sherrod said Thursday she wants to discuss racial issues with President Obama, who’s “not someone who has experienced some of the things I’ve experienced in life.”
But she also said on morning news shows she feels there is no need for Mr. Obama to apologize for her wretched week, which started with a conservative blogger posting controversial remarks she made, and led to her ouster as an Agriculture Department official and then, ultimately, apologies from both the White House and Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack.
The furor centered on a videotape on the Internet of Ms. Sherrod’s remarks, recalling her reluctance 24 years ago to help a white farmer seeking government assistance. Blogger Andew Breitbart said he posted it to illustrate that racism exists in the NAACP, an argument he was using to counter allegations by the civil rights organization of racism in the tea party.
“He was willing to destroy me … in order to try to destroy the NAACP,” Ms. Sherrod said Thursday of Mr. Breitbart, saying she still hasn’t heard an apology from him. She had argued from the start that her talk was about racial moderation and reconciliation, and that the Internet posting took her speech out of context.
Ms. Sherrod also reiterated she isn’t certain she’ll return to the Agriculture Department, even though the Obama administration acknowledged she was done a disservice by being forced out, invited out, and then rendered cross-government apologies.
Mr. Obama said nothing publicly about the developments while administration officials tried to both show his concern and to distance him from the original ouster.
Ms. Sherrod said of Mr. Obama: “I’d like to help him see some of the things that he could do in the future.”
“I really regret what they did. But as I said before, he’s my president,” Ms. Sherrod said. “When you get it down to where the rubber meets the road, I think you need to understand a little more what life is like. I’d love to talk to him, though, or people in his administration … to help them understand.”
“I can’t say that the president is fully behind me. I would hope that he is,” she added. “I would love to talk to him.”
In offering a public apology Wednesday, Mr. Vilsack told reporters: “This is a good woman. She’s been through hell. … I could have done and should have done a better job.” He addressed the media after speaking to her by phone.
Ms. Sherrod accepted Mr. Vilsack’s apology.
And a new job offer was put on the table as the administration sought to keep the embarrassing events of this week from being more than a three-day distraction.
But will Ms. Sherrod want to return to the Agriculture Department?
“They did make an offer. I just told him I need to think about it,” said Ms. Sherrod in a telephone interview with the Associated Press.
How much involvement was there from the White House? Was there White House pressure last Monday to push Ms. Sherrod out, when the snippet of remarks incorrectly suggested a racist bias?
“No,” insisted Mr. Vilsack. He said he made the decision without knowing all the facts and regretted it. “I am accepting the responsibility with deep regret,” Mr. Vilsack told reporters.
White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs also insisted the decision was one made at the Agriculture Department and he denied White House pressure for Ms. Sherrod’s immediate resignation. He apologized to Ms. Sherrod “for the entire administration.”
The president had been briefed, Mr. Gibbs said, and “he talked about the fact that a disservice had been done, an injustice had happened and, because the facts had changed, a review of the decision based on those facts should be taken.”
Ms. Sherrod appeared Thursday morning on CNN, ABC’s “Good Morning America,” CBS’s “The Early Show” and NBC’s “Today” show and on MSNBC.
Associated Press Writer Ben Feller contributed to this report.
Please read our comment policy before commenting.