LITTLE ROCK, Ark. — The Arkansas Supreme Court on Thursday tossed out a death-row inmate’s murder conviction and said he deserves a new trial because one juror slept and another tweeted during court proceedings.
Erickson Dimas-Martinez’s attorneys had appealed his 2010 murder conviction because a juror sent tweets despite the judge’s instruction not to post on the Internet or communicate with anyone about the case. The lawyers also complained that another juror slept.
In one tweet, juror Randy Franco wrote: “Choices to be made. Hearts to be broken … We each define the great line.” Less than an hour before the jury announced its verdict, he tweeted: “It’s over.”
Other tweets by Mr. Franco made passing references to the trial, with posts such as, “the coffee sucks here” and “Court. Day 5. Here we go again.”
The court said Mr. Franco, known as Juror 2 in court documents, violated general instructions to not discuss the case. Before opening arguments, the judge said: “Just remember, never discuss this case over your cellphone. … and don’t Twitter anybody about this case.”
Mr. Franco didn’t return a message left Thursday, but he has defended his tweets in the past.
“None of my texts indicated anything about the trial,” he told the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette last year. “I hadn’t made up my mind.”
That explanation seemed to satisfy a lower court judge, but it didn’t sit well with the state’s highest court.
“Because of the very nature of Twitter as an … online social-media site, Juror 2’s tweets about the trial were very much public discussions. Even if such discussions were one-sided, it is in no way appropriate for a juror to state musings, thoughts, or other information about a case in such a public fashion,” Associate Justice Donald Corbin wrote.
The justices also used the case to point out that a wide array of juror misconduct can come into play when jurors have unrestricted access to their cellphones during a trial.
Justice Corbin also asked a panel to consider whether to limit jurors’ access to cellphones during trials.
Janice Vaughn, who argued Mr. Dimas-Martinez’s case in front of the state Supreme Court last month, said the case will likely bring about new rules governing jurors’ cellphone usage. She said both examples of juror misconduct - the tweeting and the sleeping - were such profound errors that “it had to be overturned.”
An assistant attorney general had argued that the tweets were merely about the juror’s feelings and not about specifics of the trial.
Courts in Arkansas and around the country are grappling with problems caused by jurors using Twitter, Facebook or other online services during trials. In 2009, a Washington County judge dismissed an attempt to overturn a $12.6 million judgment against a building materials company, despite the firm’s complaint that a juror’s Twitter posts showed bias.
Please read our comment policy before commenting.